Saturday, December 03, 2011

CELAC-anthus

Raul at the summit?
Sometimes stuff is still born, no matter how desperately the parents of the creature try to breathe life in it.  We saw such another sad spectacle this week-end in Caracas where, minus Lula, Chavez alone could not manage to give life to that silliness that was "born" a couple of years ago in Cancun: the CELAC or in English, the Confederation of Latin American and Caribbean States.

All was not wasted for Chavez, he got an ego boost, he repeated N+1 times that he was cured, he put up a show for the 30% of us that are congenitally unable to see any fault in him.  This being said the rest of Venezuela made fun of the whole thing, when not outraged not only at the expense but at the inconvenience for Caracas to hold such an event.  After all, Chavez went to the extent to cancel Baseball Venezuelan League games and give public workers the day off Friday in a desperate effort to unclog somewhat the streets of Caracas.  That did not stop a pot banging event of some resonance to take place in Caracas Friday at 8 PM.  Certainly he did not fool any foreign visitor because, you know, they get reports from the embassies including Consuls shot in the crime wave to scarcity of food and the hours lost in a car for any errand.

The thing is not only still born but it has the strange feel of dusty fossils that one has no idea what they are for, be it a Raul Castro talking about democracy, or a Chavez talking cancer as if it were now in formaldehyde. The thing cannot prosper because it has killed its original purpose of a small group of Latin Countries with some muscle that could help other country in trouble.  Now it is an ersatz from Anguilla to Brazil whose only apparent purpose it s to exclude the USA and Canada.  I mean, the US ancestral grudge I can understand up to a point, but Canada?  And never mind the dreadful symbolism of holding a meeting of "democrats" in the main military camp (literally, under a tent) of the corrupt and drug trafficking army in what looks more and more a narco-military regime.

Still, many came but many had reasons of their very own.  Not to mention that head of states love to go to these summits because they can do a lot of business in hotel hallways, saving their country's cash from other trips that they would have to take just to meet so and so.  Let's take a few examples.  Miguel tells us clearly that Chavez desperate to have a few real head of states attend decided to pay off the long festering Mexican Cemex nationalization.  Calderon announced at the very end he would come, only after the agreement that should have been signed 3 years ago was finally done.  He spent at most 100 K to recover for CEMEX 600 millions.  Not bad.

We could say the same thing for Dilma Roussef of Brazil that could not postpone anymore a big meeting with Chavez.  Lula would have visited Chavez at least twice since he got sick, Dilma is always pushing it off, having things way more important to do.  But this week she came to tie up a few dead ends such as the PDVSA collaboration for a refinery in Pernambuco, that obligingly EFE informs us PDVSA giving cash insurance for the project.  I kid you not.

Colombia's Santos, who was already early this week in Caracas, attended to make sure that the CELAC would not get any ideas at interfering in its internal strife against the FARC.  See, the troubles of the on the run FARC could be alleviated if an "initiative of the CELAC"  (read, FARC supporters Castro and Chavez) were to offer a mediation which without doubt would put an immediate stop at the current successful offensive of the Colombian government.  Right there you know that the CELAC has no future in solving any of Latin America problems!

The possible lone voice of sanity in this gabfest was Piñera of Chile who commented that the best of the CELAC is yet to come, a diplomatic way to say that right now it is totally useless.  Of course the guy is certainly more serious than some of the other clowns attending: tomorrow he flies to real meeting in Mexico, for the second summit of the Pacific alliance.  These four countries, Chile, Peru, Colombia and Mexico, are coordinating their efforts where it really matters, to counterbalance the rising influence of Asia on the Pacific rim.  Probably Dilma would have liked to supervise that one instead, a development counter Brazil hegemonic interests in the region which are not going to be served well by the way CELAC is turning out so far...

And others simply came because Venezuela footed the bill for their trip (you know who you are), because they wanted to see on their own how sick Chavez was and how long they could keep expecting an occasional alimony, or some other equally irrelevant reason.  At any rate neither the US, nor Canada or the OAS seem to have lost any sleep on this issue, probably secretly hoping for the soon to be demise of the OAS so that they will not have to bankroll it anymore..

One thing is certain and that is the message these people gave the Venezuelan people: we do not give a shit about your problems, your lack of democracy, your wanna be dictator.  As long as Chavez is going to give us freebies you are on your own.

12 comments:

  1. Charly9:52 PM

    Le Monde? Nada! Der Spiegel? Nada! Drudge Report? Nada! Shall I go on? An historical event? Indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  2. torres10:00 PM

    "the message these people gave the Venezuelan people"

    You nailed it, maybe even gave them too much credit. That is, telling us they couldn't care less about us is actually caring enough to let us know they don't. I don't even think they care enough to even be talking to us; they're just grabbing the freebies while they are available.

    --

    ReplyDelete
  3. charly

    TVE did report on it. they made me feel guilty enough to write on that?

    ReplyDelete
  4. CharlesC10:50 PM

    Chavez is not and has yet to find
    the "kryptonite" to use against
    the Superman (US).The same is true of Castro. What Chavez and Chastro have found is the ability to lure the weak and uneducated with their propaganda...
    Yeah, this was a snobs party at Chavez expense.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous12:53 AM

    Raul Castro at the summit?

    Er, pardon me. Who elected this clown to represent the Cuban people? And, if he claims he was elected by the Cuban people, when was the vote? What was the final vote tally? Who was the opposition? What were the 'choices' of the Cuban people?

    There were none. Where does this fossil derive his legitimacy for attending a Latin American summit in the year 2011? Finally, why aren't so-called journalists asking these very simple questions of this canard appearing in Caracas concerning hie efforts to supposedly represent the Cuban people?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:03 AM

    Rodrigo Cabezas: "La Celac no excluye a nadie, es de toda Latinoamérica" (Celac doesn't exclude anyone: it belongs to all of Latin America)

    What about the last "C" in CELAC? Some of those Caribbean heads of state are not "latin". Ask any Trinitarian or Guyanese. Why did they come, just for the money? Or to be entertained by Dudamel?

    ReplyDelete
  7. snook7210:16 AM

    How about the Pres of Panama....telling it how it is.... They should set up a committee to follow up on all the grand ideas that they conjure up at these meetings because quite frankly they never amount to anything. Read the link below.

    http://www.noticias24.com/venezuela/noticia/40439/martinelli-pide-creacion-de-una-secretaria-ejecutiva-para-que-acuerdos-no-queden-en-nada/

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous10:54 AM

    And after the meeteing, do they all transpose themseves to their childhood and play in that gimcrackery in the center space of the conference tables as a teambuilding exercise?

    Mike

    ReplyDelete
  9. The problem is that many people in LA lack a sense of the absurd.

    Raul Castro and Chavez holding forth on democracy while the 2 most democratic countries of the continent are excluded...what reasons are those for doing that? ideological, racist? xenophobic or in order to exclude those whose democratic values are too strong ;)? what IS the reason? hmmm......

    ReplyDelete
  10. If the Cuban model had been economically successful, many on the left would have chosen it. The Castros are often revered in Left Wing circles for having brought the Left Wing dogmas to LA.Fidel Castro's larger than life image cannot be just attributed to the embargo.

    As an example, we can look at the visit of Michelle Bachelet to Fidel who came back raving about the profundity and wisdom of this great man.

    As long as the Left has this admiration for the Castros we can forget about them finding fault with Hugo Chavez.

    ReplyDelete
  11. snook7212:56 PM

    I think this was just to measure who Venezuela can buy and who they can't. Hugo will need a lot of people in his corner come this election.They need people that may look the other way when it comes to election issues. I can see it now....Celac observers welcome, but not OAS, US or European observers. This was to test the waters and see what and how much it will cost him.

    Thats just my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
  12. "CELAC-anthus" - brilliant. Y ya es un orgnizacion CALC-ificada. Puns aside, this body is out-dated and useless. It will never achieve anything greater than back-slapping and photo ops. Well, in concrete terms, it will continue to drain Venezuela's resources, but I was only trying to capture the positive accomplishments - such as they are.

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers