Friday, December 27, 2013

2013 in review: the year they rubbed in our faces that this is a military dictatorship

We have to grant something to Chavez: he was political enough to be careful to pretend to hide that we were a military dictatorship. For example in very visible posts he put a lot of women that were mere errand boys (chief "justice", attorney general, minister for elections). Real power always rested in his hands and a counted machos, often working in the shadows. And most of them were military with a sprinkling of Cuban attachés like Maduro.  But we knew, the more so if you needed to deal a lot with the high administration, that real power was always behind the desk of some military "on leave".  Without looking further, 12 governors today, 50%, are military or military related. To which you can add the chair of the Nazional Assembly and a few ministers. Nothing major happens in Venezuela without the army knowledge and approval.


The difference this year is that it is becoming an in "your face" siutation. Today was tops: Maduro announced that he will reintegrate to the army all the officers that participated in the 1992 coups and had thus received a dishonorable discharge.  And to add insult to injury, they will get back in the armed forces with a superior grade than the one they were discharged with. I am sure that they will receive "back" benefits though I am sure they have stolen enough money not to be in any need of those.

Not even Chavez, during his life presidency, dared to do so, notwithstanding his constant threats to proceed on that matter.

But that is merely the necessary footnote for a year into which Maduro had to yield lots of benefits to the army. You know, to thank them for allowing him to steal the election of last April.  The fact of the matter is that 2013 was littered with evidence of military power inside the regime.  I can comment for example on the constant meetings that Maduro must hold with them, publicly, something that Chavez did not have to do as much; or did because he enjoyed the limelight and medal glitter.  But I will limit myself to two items.

El Nacional publishes the staggering number that since 1999 1614 military have been named to positions of authority inside public administration. Of this 368 alone have been appointed by Maduro in barely a year. 'nuf said!

Of course, such power outside of any control is an open invitation to a major corruption of the armed forces. Since there is no justice and that there is no way you can sue and have a military investigated inside Venezuela today we must resort to indirect evidence. Drug trafficking is one. Many military generals are in the eye of the DEA in the US and several are already in the list of folks that, well, better not travel outside of VeneCuba.... Not to mention that some are already starting to find the way on their own to the US before they get shot during some drug traffic "settlement" inside Venezuela (Aponte, Isea and ?)

But for me the most illustrative moment was when an Air France civilian plane was loaded with more than one ton of cocaine in 30+ pieces of luggage, obviously overweight but no baggage handler complained the way they do elsewhere forcing you to unpack your bags in public in front of the registration counter.  So far, the regime has been very successful at trying to hide the scandal in Venezuela by inculpating small fry. But such an operation could only have been carried with the acquiescence of very high ranking military, not only at Caracas airport but all the way along from Colombia to the airport. Yet, Maiquetia president, General Luis Graterol, has not been questioned that we know of.  I know, he may be lily-white innocent but why has he not resigned for not keeping a tight lid on his staff? Why have we not read substantial declarations from him? Guilty or not, he is a general and he cannot be bothered. He is out of reach whatsoever. That privilege is what makes a military regime.

3 comments:

  1. Boludo Tejano1:15 PM

    Of the three English language bloggers on Venezuela, you are the one who puts the most emphasis on the milico influence in the Chavez/Maduro regime. The milico appointees by Maduro is a telling stat. It is a shame that more foreign outlets- BBC, NYT, Reuters WaPo etc- do not point out such military ties to the regime.

    Evita III and her late husband in Argentina made a big point of waving the bloody shirt against the milicos- which they believed would still gain political capital 30 years after the events in question. I wonder how Evita III would respond to a journalist asking her what she thought of appointing 300 military officers to civilian posts in her administration. Evita II would then go into a harangue about the evils of milico penetration etc. Then the journalist would point out that is precisely what Maduro did- in addition to the 1200 already there.

    If Maduro is set to pardon those who participated in the 1992 coup, that would indicate to me that he doesn't see much danger of a coup against him. As the milicos get rich from the drug trafficking, why would they instigate a coup?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Boludo

      The silence of foreign outlets is truly shameful. But I know that some newspaper correspondent do not want to insist on that because they could lose already the rare "sources" that are willing to risk to talk to them, amen of being expelled outright if they were to suggest some unpleasantness associated with red berets; so they apply self censorship. Also, since journos do not do business in Venezuela they are less prone to encounter a corrupt military appointee that asks you bluntly so much for a given permit. Well, they do not do it personally ever, they have intermediate that ask you bluntly, with a discrete side payment for their good offices. This experience is not only from what my friends and customers have told me, but from personal experience when at least three times we had to "bajarnos de la mula" to save the joint. Not to make money with the joint, just to save the joint.

      Of course, if I were to find a journo willing to help me it would not help. The journo would be thrown to jail, or forced to leave fast, and the judicial system will "dismiss" my claim because, oh, there is a missing comma somewhere. Then I would get all sorts of inspections from all sorts of governmental agencies until I go bankrupt or they decide to expropriate me. Not only I lose my business but my workers are also suffering the consequences, losing their job. They may be chavistas, many of them, but my ethics do not allow me, or the immense majority of business owners of Venezuela to jeopardize their well being just because we want to make a point.

      Only El Pais and ABC of Spain seem truly aware and on occasion do let slip a few items in their articles.

      As for why my competition does not talk as much on the nefarious role of the army? Well, I do not know. I suppose that I live in Venezuela, inside the country, and I write about what I see and the values of civilization broken everyday in front of my eyes. They write about other intellectual constructs. Or money which is what people truly care about after all.

      Or maybe simply because I am a true liberal in a sub continent with few values and many parasites, humans or otherwise. As such I have strong allergy to anything around here wearing a red beret and handling guns and strutting his power. Everyday I am proven right over and over again.

      Delete
  2. charly9:25 PM

    Daniel, this year I was blessed to spend more time out of Venezuela than inside and, through Africa, South East Asia, Europe and North America, I found out that nobody, absolutely nobody is interested in the plight of Venezuela, Amen.

    Happy new year to all.

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers