Saturday, March 27, 2010

Apartheid alive and well in Venezuela

If today's apartheid in Venezuela is not really racial it is nevertheless fast reaching equally evil proportions, all historical considerations taken into account.  That is, today it would be nearly impossible to establish a segregationist racial regime whereas South Africa had really not much trouble in creating one.  Creative chavismo, at least in those matters, is showing the way on how a political apartheid can be established, in the XXI century, under the eyes of the world which at best mutters solid condemnations that make chavismo back-down slightly and provisionally in its march toward institutional political hate fulfillment.

Today I can point out to three highly representative items.


Trampling parliamentary immunity

I reported yesterday that representative Wilmer Azuaje was involved in a troubled incident.  In less than 24 hours the high court TSJ decided and the Nazional Assembly removed his parliamentary immunity.  Now compare this with the following:
  • Representative Iris Varela appears in videos physically attacking two people much more violently than Wilmer Azuaje allegedly did (and for which no substantial proof has been offered yet).  And yet she never had to worry about her parliamentary immunity revoked.
  • In all the proceedings today as far as we know Wilmer Azuaje never had a chance to speak and defend himself, be it at the TSJ, be it at the Nazional Assembly. He might be guilty as hell for all that we know but he should at least be given the opportunity to account for his actions.
  • Contrast the speed at which the TSJ decided with say, the innumerable complaints that have been residing without replies about such notorious cases like RCTV, Globovision, and other media people, just to select a particularly present situation.

 The crime of Azuaje is of course to have been exposing the corruption of the Chavez famiglia in Barinas state and to be currently leading in polls there.  The trap had been set long ago and chavismo needed only to fill in the blanks of the paper work, violating parliamentary procedure and the constitution along the way.  Azuaje might not be allowed to run for reelection, by the way.

Delayed justice is not justice

The second item is the condemnation of journalist Azocar in San Cristobal (incidentally one of the two victims of representative Iris Varela).  The affair is an obscure lottery advertisement contract.  In other words peanuts when compared tot he gazillions that minister and ex Miranda governor Diosdado Cabello has allegedly embezzled, for which he has been properly denounced and for which the state has not started any official investigation that we know of.  Fortunately for Azocar they could only give him a 2+ year sentence and since he almost served it as he was in jail through the whole trial he can walk out with certain prohibitions such as been forbidden to move out of state or travel outside the country.  And apparently he will not allowed to run for election.  Imagine that!  He was the shoo in candidate in Tachira state.

Are we starting to see a pattern here?

Not everyone is allowed to vote

The third evidence for the apartheid-ization of Venezuela comes from the pages of El Universal.

The government has just passed a new law to kill the decentralization of the country, dividing it all in small "consejos comunales" (kind of soviets like system) which will depend from unelected bureaucrats in Caracas rather than the dutifully elected local governors or mayors.  In other words, if your local consejo is not directed by red shirt folks you are going to get zilch, no matter how much taxes you pay (not that it makes any difference for those who pay taxes today).

Now these XXI century soviets are to be organized into a federal organization that will replace and take over many of the functions of the National Assembly, rending this one into a decorative item of the government at best, kind of a rubber stamp validation headquarters.  Yes, that is right, direct elections will be replaced by tiered indirect elections, Cuba style.  That does not worry me much in the sense that Chavez controls everything and I will be eventually expropriated from my home by the local consejo rather than a governmental fiat.  The end result is the same.

What is not the same is the cynicism deployed in organizing this new Federal Council.  See, the Universal note tells us that only the pro Chavez organizations of the Baruta district  received an invitation to the election of the Baruta delegates to the Miranda/local Consejo Federal.  Baruta is a Caracas district that votes 80% against Chavez and because of the secrecy in which the Consejo formation was held it will be represented by 100% pro Chavez fascist red shirts.

Of course Baruta townhall is going to battle this and the issue is not over, but that is not the point here.  What this tells us is to which extremes chavismo is willing to go to create a client base and use that dependency to control any opponent.

--------------------------

The way an apartheid state function is by creating permanent divisions with enough individuals willing to sell themselves to the system in order to get some material benefit, or simply power over their neighbors.  Color of skin is of course a very easy way to create such a division, but cheap political tricks and actual political discrimination can eventually yield to the same result.

One thing you need to understand is that even if the good burgers of Baruta were to decide to make a pact with Chavez, that would never make them full citizens again.  This also works in individual cases as it does not matter whether Wilmer Azuaje asks for forgiveness or persists in his accusations against the Chavez corrupt clan: he will always be the necessary victim to scare into submission the other representatives at the Nazional Assembly that could consider at some point to vote against Chavez.  I have in mind the PPT who is in trouble these days for accepting Lara's governor Falcon and whose representatives withdrew today from the sahemeful debate at the Nazional Assembly.

An Apartheid regime does not quite work like the Cuban one even if the end results will be the same.  An apartheid regime works in creating constantly a group of second class citizens.  When these second class citizens are dead or leave the country or ask for forgiveness they will only be "forgiven" or forgotten once the system found another group to hate because the system always need an internal enemy where to focus the hate of its right citizens.  Cuba could avoid the formalism of an apartheid like system because it was an island, because Fidel got full power very quickly and because the embargo policy of the US gave the regime a convenient hate figure to rally the dumb masses.  But Chavez is in the XXI century, Venezuela is not an island and the US is buying all of our oil, at least as long as its armies are bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Thus the need for Chavez to segregate the country, to coalesce around him a group of bribed and/or hate filled folks to scare the rest of the population into submission.  That is why a political apartheid is developed.

And it has been working so far.  For example who remembers today that Chavez was elected largely through the electoral expertise of the MAS who directed his 1998 campaign?  When the MAS defected after 2002 it was so vilified that its followers either went into oblivion or joined PODEMOS.  Today PODEMOS which left Chavez in 2007 is suffering the same fate as the MAS.  I allow myself to wonder if the embers of the MAS were to ask Chavez forgiveness and entry in the PSUV if this one would not welcome them in a big show even if it would not give him or them much in return.

That apartheid/hate creation system also works on people that were never in bed with Chavez.  AD and COPEI nearly disappeared as they were the 1998 enemies, the people that needed to be dominated and brought to their rightful place (do you remember the promise to fry the heads of AD followers?).  You cannot count today the amount of local prominent chavistas redder than red who a decade ago where AD or COPEI, starting with Chavez own father.  If AD and COPEI are not dead it is due more to the incompetence of chavismo than any ability by them to fight back the verbal onslaught of Chavez.

Finally isolated cases of redemption occur to demonstrate that the beloved leader can be magnanimous at times if you are willing to grovel low enough.  Arias Cardenas, equal co-author of the 1992 coup where he was in charge of Zulia and succeeded as opposed to Chavez lame failure in Caracas, became worse than shit when in 2000 he dared to run against Chavez.  And today he is working for Chavez as a foreign policy errand boy where he shows his great limitations.  Amazingly he retains a weekly column at El Universal, a column that has evolved from constant criticism to abject sycophancy.....  The message is clear: if you dare to challenge you will be turned into a second class citizen from where there is never any real return anyway.  The best you can hope is that if your groveling is convincing enough you will be allowed to finish your life in ridicule.

15 comments:

  1. Daniel,
    This video sums up a good portion of what you just described. I guess Zuloaga is not "white" enough...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjZ4sJ504H8&feature=player_embedded

    ReplyDelete
  2. jiec

    i did not get your comment. care to explain better?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Boludo Tejano10:26 AM

    Like it was said in Animal Farm, some are more equal than others. As others have already pointed out.

    I can why Thugo goes full tilt like this, because if he ever gets off the bicycle he is riding, he will not get back up. There have too many billions stolen and too many gross violations of the Constitution - which is a Chavista creation- for there not to be some consequences if he ever lets up.

    Where will the run of the mill Chavista be when this all ends?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Boludo

    In apartheid animal farm does not apply. It applies in Cuba but not in Venezuela.

    The idea of apartheid is to put into the mind of people that a group is INFERIOR and that surely you would not want to join them. In animal Farm some are more equal than other, with the subtle distinction that that we all start equal. With Chavez system, much more primitive with a clear tribal content, we are not equal. It is never stated officially of course but that is how the "masses" understand it. They want to be members of the tribe, not more or less equal. Membership to the tribe is preferable to equality.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Just out of curiosity... could a regular fella, citizen (don't know the term) who had fallen in with a bad crowd...... say the opposition and gotten on the T-List... can they get off?

    Is this a permanent situation or is there mobility? I don't mean class or income, just from Group A to Group B. How would a move (either direction) affect family, friends, worker pals.

    Seriously are there examples?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Meh, to be some what more clear.. how much mobility is there in regards to politics? What are the penalties of change?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Daniel,
    Your post sums up how Venezuela has become a two-tiered society. Your apartheid analogy made me think of the "rojos" as the South African whites during apartheid.

    The video shows Arias Cardenas calling Chavez an assassin following the April 11 events.
    Zuloaga is being prosecuted for alluding to the same events, and basically saying the same thing Arias Cardenas said.

    I just thought that given the Zuloaga zaga, the video summed up a lot of what you were saying. And as a bonus, its protagonist is one of the prime examples of how this version of apartheid operates.

    ReplyDelete
  8. La segregación cualquiera que sea es mala, en cualquier parte del mundo, aquí ya estamos segregados dos veces, una por ser de oposición y otra racial, de esto último no entiendo porque somos toditos toditicos mezclados, en más o menos proporción así que para mi esta última no me importa y nunca en mi vida desprecie alquién por ser de otro color. Pero la segregación politica es la peor, y ya entiendo los pueblos que fueron segregados, el inmenso odio y rencor que llevaban por dentro ahora lo llevan los venezolanos, esto si es PELIGROSO!

    ReplyDelete
  9. torres5:38 PM

    Daniel, in Animal Farm, at the end, the animals stop being equal. The part about "more equal than others" is just one of the transition phases to the final phase in which the pigs are walking on two legs..

    ReplyDelete
  10. torres

    i know animal farm, thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous ,

    You brought up a point I find interesting: that political segregation is the worst kind of segregation.At first I disagreed because one can change one's ideas to fit in- if so desired- but one cannot change one's race.But on second thought I remembered that political segregation divides families which is synonymous with attacking the basis of a person's most important source of stability outside himself and this is so much worse.

    In Venezuela, families are divided and this is sad and scary.I am lucky in that within my family there is no animosity among members of Chavismo and opposition ( we are a flexible, super close, tight, musically oriented family as opposed to a more serious,loose knit but methodical type clan and as such, we can get along with each other no matter what -but I have seen many other families whose fate is quite different: cousins writing off cousins, family reunions canceled, sisters not talking with each other etc etc.

    Here in the USA we have , in a much milder form, something similar going on, and it is hateful as well:From the Economist:"Americans are increasingly choosing to live among like-minded neighbors. This makes the culture war more bitter and politics harder," writes The Economist.

    http://atlanticreview.org/archives/1100-Political-Segregation-Increases-Culture-Wars-in-America.html
    to me NOTHING is worse than ideology.Ideas are great but ideology creates a barrier to the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Charly11:05 AM

    HalfEmpty, a regular fella, citizen can get off the Tascon list if he is connected, if he can dole out some money and also if they need badly his/her expertise. They just remove his entry from the official database. I know one such case.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Milonga3:09 PM

    Dano: What is Class Struggle but an apartheid in itself? Thugo keeps putting the rich against the poor, saying that the rich have humiliated the poor enough, and humiliates them back. Never mind if you are richer yourself due to corruption and all. That's all for a good cause... you know. Sickening, to say the least!

    ReplyDelete
  14. milonga

    there is a difference.

    in theory class struggle wants to even up the field, up supposedly.

    in the tribal chavista model, this is beyond class struggle: there is always the need for a enemy. that is why, for example, you can have boligurguesia. they are the rich members of the tribe but they belong to the tribe.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Daniel,

    Have you read news on the arrest of Ecuadorian journalist, Emilio Palacio? I'm seeing a nexus between his arrest and those arrested recently in Venezuela

    http://bit.ly/92xCos

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers