Friday, July 23, 2010

Why Colombia did get so personal yesterday at the OAS?

I have been fascinated by the different comments coming from everywhere, be it the insensate and violent ones from Cilia Flores, chair of the Venezuelan Nazional Assembly, or be they from some insensate "come flores" who wallow on technicalities that the OAS procedures were not kosher and that it was the same old story anyway.  And it occurred to me that pretty much everyone is missing the forest for the tree.  What happened yesterday in Washington was Colombia serving notice to the world that a tragedy is brewing in Venezuela and that they are not willing to shoulder the cost alone.

Let's start by three basics here.

No country knows better what happens in Venezuela than Colombia.  Estimates of Colombians living in Venezuela range from a couple of millions to 5 or more.  Let's say that we accept a reasonable estimate of 3 million Colombian citizens settled in Venezuela but still with frequent contacts with the folks at home.  We can say that this 3 million people are more than enough to bring crisp an reasonable information home about the reality they have to deal with in Venezuela.  How else can you explain that the image of Chavez is so negative inside Colombia and that Uribe numbers are inflated in part due to his image as a non Chavez system of governance?

If the situation gets worse in Venezuela which country will suffer the brunt of it?  Colombia!  Where will go the millions of Colombians that feel there is no future anymore in Venezuela?  To Colombia!  And when things get really bad and hundred of thousand of Venezuelan refugees start leaving Venezuela where will they go on foot?  To Guyana?  Rafting to Trinidad or Aruba? To Brazil after a trek through the Guayana highlands?  No, they will go to Colombia, the more so that Zulia, Merida and Tachira are on the border with Colombia and that among them they represent the most densely settled area of Venezuela after the Caracas-Valencia axis.

Colombians know very well that the situation is getting worse and worse in Venezuela and that the longer Chavez stays in office the more the risk of an economic collapse.  With such an economic collapse that cannot be dealt with properly because the  government is absolutely trapped in an ideological cum thuggery spiral there is no outcome but violence, civil unrest and repression.  For Colombians it is now a simple question of calendar, with the real danger that for internal reasons Venezuela may decide to sponsor further FARC terrorist camps to cause trouble in Colombia as a distracting measure from Venezuelan home troubles.  Or do you believe for a second that Chavez will look benevolently on a prosperous Colombia while his people stand in line at Mercals, even in the house of Bolivar?

Thus Colombia is faced with the prospect of millions of Colombian returning, to which a million or two Venezuelans could be added (a few hundred thousand just through bi-national families).  Not only Colombia is not ready to face such an flood of refugees, but they can bring along all sort of 5th column undesirables trained in the FARC camps in everything from terrorist activity to narco-business so as to revive the local one and counter any advances Uribe did against drug traffic and guerilla.  For Colombia it is not anymore a matter of if, but a matter of when and what could be done to minimize the onslaught.

Which brings us to the third basic reality for Colombia.  Outside of the US  of A Colombia is all alone in this.  Uribe administration has been complaining for years about the support of Chavez to the FARC and nothing has happened in Latin America.  Even meager efforts were silently sabotaged by Brazil diplomacy who among other things created UNASUR to impose the influence of Brazil in the region against the US and even Mexico, as a good way to isolate within South America any potential rival such as Colombia.  That UNASUR is failing does not detract an iota to the feeling among Colombians in the know that when shit happens in Venezuela they will be left alone to take care of the collateral damage, and probably pay for it alone too as certainly it will not be the Brazilian companies that got rich at the expense of the break down of the Colombia Venezuela trade that will chip in much for the refugees camp inside Colombia.

Once you understand these realities you can put the pieces together about the events yesterday.  For example some ambassadors bemoaned that the Colombian envoy, Luis Alfonso Hoyos, meddled in Venezuelan inner affairs instead of limiting himself to the business at hand.  What they missed is that Hoyos was not talking to them, he was talking directly to the Venezuelan people, in near colloquial or emotional terms at times, knowing full well that his speech would be repeated inside Venezuela.  The message was: "look at what Chavez is doing!  You are going to pay for this if you do not do something about it!  Poor you!  We feel your pain!"  Not as a threat but as a support from Colombia, adding that Colombia was not seeking any sanction, was merely trying to help.  Very undiplomatic for the stiff necks of the OAS but that was the objective since Colombia has tested once again how useless the OAS has become under its current secretary Insulza.  Colombia harbors no illusion about the OAS or UNASUR and has decided to strike on its own, with the support for the US and soon the one from Europe, Canada and possibly Chile and Peru once this last one goes though its next presidential elections.  However as a loud speaker the OAS can still be of some use, as Hoyos showed yesterday.

The fact of the matter is that the Venezuelan inner affairs have ceased to be only Venezuelan affairs and that the FARC camps are only one of the aspects in which Chavez erroneous policies are starting to affect Colombia.  Uribe and Santos know that very well and that is why they do not care about the break up of relations.  After all, for all practical purposes, relations between Venezuela and Colombia were at a standstill, the Colombian ambassador to Caracas complaining that it had no access to anyone in the government.  Her prompt recall, before Hoyos presentation, was a sure sign that Colombia knew that the only reply from Chavez could be the official break up between the two countries, sanctioning the practical one.

The paradox here is that Uribe by playing such a coarse bad guy role is in fact cleaning up the slate for Santos.  This one will take office with a situation cleared up with Venezuela.  Bad and negative situation for sure, but a clear one for which there is no other way but up.  As a bonus point it is Uribe who served official notice to the rest of the Americas that Venezuela was becoming everyone's problem and that if measures could not or would not be taken it was necessary at least to quarantine safely Chavez until he defuses himself, without much trouble if possible.  Nobody likes to be served notice, even if the notice is perfectly justified.

I would venture to add that the rather meek reaction of Chavez yesterday, limiting himself to break up with Colombia, and letting his Cilia Flores like take charge of the insults and vulgarities is a witness of Chavez taking the measure of his growing isolation.  He had to break up with Colombia because it was the only way he could avoid an international inspection that he knew would leave him very weak.  But he did not go to war, let it know that no further action would be taken because he knew that he is alone on that one as Cuba, Nicaragua and Bolivia are not enough to allow him to do more.

Thus now we are in an official standstill, consular services probably operating at least until Santos takes charge in a couple of weeks.  For all practical purposes it does not change anything since as a reader told us in a recent post comment that already Ecuador trade with Colombia had caught up with the current trade with Venezuela.  The only thing we know for sure is that trade with Colombia is not going to increase, that Colombians will stop coming to Venezuela except for the FARC sympathizers and that Chavez took a major slap in the face yesterday, even if most do not realize it yet.

And how does this play at home?  Certainly it does not help the opposition much.  This one is in the difficult position of having to chose between Uribe and Chavez, but with a much weakened Chavez at home, with Pudreval and other corruption and inefficiency scandals, when the 70% + ratings of Uribe are known by all here, the dichotomy is much easier to overcome than a year or two ago.  The best thing to do is to ignore the break up and go back ASAP to the diverse Pudrevals of the regime.  Only the truly hard core chavista KoolAid drinkers will believe that Chavez is innocent: most Venezuelans know or sense that Chavez is hiding something and thus he will not be able to use the nationalistic card this time.  Nor is he trying, by the way, at least up to now, let's grant him that.

17 comments:

  1. I totally agree with you Daniel. Spot on.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous12:05 PM

    great analysis mon cher...

    also, to prove that the OAS is perhaps the most useless diplomatic organism there is nowadays, thanks to Ch petrodollars

    ReplyDelete
  3. Alek, coming from you it is quite unexpected. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Boludo Tejano12:48 PM

    Colombians in the know that when shit happens in Venezuela they will be left alone to take care of the collateral damage, and probably pay for it alone too as certainly it will not be the Brazilian companies that got rich at the expense of the break down of the Colombia Venezuela trade that will chip in much for the refugees camp inside Colombia.

    Indeed. You see Uribe and Santos taking the long view, and in the long view, it appears that Chávez will leave power only as a result of the collapse of Venezuela, which will result in a massive influx of refugees to Colombia. It appears that Chávez will not leave as a result of elections. He can finesse loss of the legislature by emasculating the legislature and by his already having created alternate institutions. Regarding presidential elections: he has control of the electoral machinery- which would also suggest he would not lose control of the legislature. With the electoral path shut off, collapse is the only way Chávez will leave power.

    And Colombia will reap the whirlwind.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Daniel,

    Yours was the first calm, rational, and well thought out analysis of this event I have read so far. I think that if you haven't got it "spot on", you are in the "nine" ring.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why would you be surprised? I have written things that resemble a great deal what you wrote.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AB

    Well, you were more negative on Uribe than I am.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hey, among us veneco bloggers, I must have been the first one to say that Uribe was outchavezing Chavez. He continues to do so. Uribe no da puntada sin hilo. That does not mean he's an infallible saint, and we can't criticise him. Saying that he's a hypocrite, does not detract from the fact that his country is better of, heaps more, than when he took over 8 years ago. That, in my book, is the best measure of a leader.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Juan Cristobal4:13 PM

    "This one will take office with a situation cleared up with Venezuela. Bad and negative situation for sure, but a clear one for which there is no other way but up."

    You guys seem to think that the situation with Venezuela is just a temporary lovers' spat.

    I'd be willing to wage money that by this time next year, relations with Venezuela have not been re-established.

    I hope I'm wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  10. JC

    Writing that there is no way to go but up does not mean it is going to happen right then and there. I agree with you, we will make it to 2011 without relations, probably mid 2011, whatever the result of September 26 is, if we still vote that day.....

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey Juan, I'll take you up on that. FT owes me a bottle of something already, so why don't we make it double or nothing, that by this time next year, relations with Colombia would be back to "normal"?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Great analysis, Daniel, and I'd wager that many in the GOC would agree with it.

    The question now - after the OAS thing yesterday and the GOV severance of relations - is what happens next? Many bemoan the break in relations, but at this point, is that so bad? Colombia can take pleasure in the fact that the GOV has shot itself in the political foot again in front of everyone, and ultimately, who suffers more from this? Not the Colombians, that's for sure.

    In that context, if one asks when relations might be renewed, does it matter to Colombia whether it's 2010 or 2011, or whenever? A bit, perhaps, but not nearly as much as it does to Venezuela.

    Coming back to the question of what happens next, I don't think the renewal of relations is the most important point; I think it's the problem of the FARC presence in Venezuela and what Colombia's going to do about it. The Colombia knows just as well as everyone else that Chavez will do nothing about this problem, which leaves it up to the Colombians, and we know what they're like, they won't do nothing forever....

    ReplyDelete
  13. Great post Daniel

    There are those including the BBC who complained that Colombia is at fault for not having presented presented the evidence immediately or at the moment it was found.


    Colombia is not a local prosecutor ,it is a sovereign nation.It has no obligation to act immediately if it considers that something is not in its National interest, and is free to choose the most opportune moment.As long as there was some hope of improving relations with Venezuela, or at least maintaining the bilateral trade, they had a right to postpone
    confronting Chavez.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think that Chavez and PSUV publicly saying they are MARXIST http://english.eluniversal.com/2010/07/23/en_ing_esp_the-psuv-manifesto_23A4229771.shtml has more than a little to do with this. It makes them no different than the violent MARXIST FARC that Colombia has been fighting for many years now. They are both the same movement!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous11:53 AM

    I had been thinking about Colombia's willingness to share with everyone the coordinates of the FARC campsites. Was that wise? Sure, as Hoyos said, they might be able to move the camps, but it's nearly impossible for them to erase the evidence that there was a camp in the middle of the jungle, so even if they move, they'd still prove Colombia right.

    But then I noticed all the Chavista calls to send troops and red-shirts to the frontier, and I realized that they were not sending them to support Chavez or to defend from a Colombian attack, they are sending them to help FARC move the camps are erase evidence of their presence.

    The detail that Chavez missed is this: now that everyone knows where the camps are, everyone (including Interpol and the people at La Haya) are looking at the live satellite pictures. And they're about to catch, live on satellite TV, as 10000 GN and red-shirts help the FARC move their camps.

    Before this, Chavez could simply claim that he didn't know the FARC campsites were there, and there was little to do to prove him wrong. But with 10000 government employees caught red-handed helping the FARC move, there's absolutely no possibility to claim innocence anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  16. There are just 2 possibilities.The FARC camps are situated in Venezuela, or they are not.


    Chavez would have us believe that he would promote the inauguration of a statue of his hero Marulanda but at the same time, that he is NOT hosting the FARC camps in Venezuela?

    Chavez breaks relationship with Colombia for what reason?For daring to "falsely" accuse Chavez of what everyone knows is a simple fact that he is hosting these camps.

    Chavez's strategy has always been to obfuscate and create a fog of contradictions and uncertainty whereas this accusation by Colombia is taking away the mask of diplomatic civility and calling a spade a spade.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 1979 Boat People9:21 PM

    Excelent article, Daniel.

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers