Saturday, December 18, 2010

The Sur del Lago region is resisting the potential narco-guerrilla take over

Dangerous escualidos defending their job
It seems that censorship is working inside Venezuela because I learned late that the 47 farms that were expropriated last week in what we call "Sur del Lago"are resisting the unjust chavista take over.  Not only I learned about this recent development late but I learned it through Colombian TV while Globovision was continuing its "normal " programming.....  Although there are already pictures available on the web the information is meager, just official TV relating that all is going well in the "rescue" of abandoned land and El Universal who is more explicit and which writes that three, 3, battalions of the army have been dispatched to take over these, I assume considering the extensive army deployment.

 So, while we learn more about the situation allow me to give you some background because as it turns out I am familiar with the area economics and I have even friends whose relatives are in one of the expropriated farms.

First the chavista lies are particularity disgusting and manipulative, and I am not even referring to the Komissar display that I mentioned yesterday.  Those are rich lands but hard to work because the climate is unfavorable, the land can frequently flood, critters make your life miserable if you are not prepared.  Contrary to what Chavez would like us to believe, a lot of these lands were developed by people willing to invest, build access roads, etc, etc...   The lone pioneer did not have a chance there, the land was not stolen form anyone as I suspect that even Native Americans preferred by far to move up to easier conditions in the Andes bordering these lands.

In other words those are lands that need constant work, constant attention and are not suitable to absentee landlords because, well, the jungle takes it back real quick if the master's eye is not ever vigilant.

But the rewards are good: it is a great land for dairy farming and banana plantations and a very large portion of Venezuelan food comes from there.  No more soon, we can be certain.

While is the regime taking over something that we all know it cannot manage?  Any precedent from land seizure of this regime, in easier lands to "develop", has been a failure.  What could allow us to think that this time around it will be different?

Several things, in my modest opinion, account for the surge in chavismo harassment for that region.

Sur del Lago is an entrepreneur region and its success is a constant mockery of chavismo agrarian ventures elsewhere.  Shoot the messenger is certainly a motivation for chavismo.

Second, Sur del Lago is shared by the states of Merida and Zulia and those states are increasingly moving away of the chavista orbit, even in the agricultural land.  They must be punished.

Third and in my opinion the most likely one.  The FARC and narco guerilla refuges close to the Colombian borders have been put into evidence shortly before Uribe left office.  They need to be relocated in a humid and wooded area, further from the Colombian border but not that far.   Basically Sur del Lago is the only region available as hinterland farms are difficult to monitor for Colombia security, or so is chavismo hoping.  See, the roads exit, the extensions are important, there is water and banana year round and under the protection of the Nazional Guard narco guerilla can easily commute to Colombia since Sur del Lago is sort of equidistant from the the three major entry points of Colombia, the Arauca, the Tachira and the Catatumbo.  heck! Once the farmers are displaced we could even change the cultures to some more narco palatable stock.....

4 comments:

  1. Viva la revolucion verdadera (en contra de la dictadura)!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oligarca del Lago: Una residente de El Peonio, la hacienda de Mellan. desnuda las mentiras de Esteban, en venezuela http://youtu.be/TZxkUW-lzoc

    ReplyDelete
  3. Boludo Tejano1:00 AM

    I would not have considered the Narco/FARC connection, as I saw the confiscations simply as a way to stick it to the Zulianos, a particularly anti-Chavista and ornery group. BTW, it is no accident that Zulia, the largest state by population, had 149,498 registered voters per Assembly seat, while Barinas had 80,398 voters per Assembly seat. Mérida had 91,247 voters per Assembly seat. Smaller states tended to vote PSUV, so they were assigned more representatives.[esdata]

    You were thinking ahead of the curve. I wonder if FARC movements from Sur del Lago areas could be tracked by satellite, by showing an anomalous traffic pattern.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous10:29 PM

    Ojo, ya le metieron la censura, no pude abrir la foto, sale un aviso que dice página prohibida, sera que aplican la Ley antes de publicarla? que desgraciados! La Maga Lee

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers