Monday, October 17, 2011

Venezuela slaps the international system: the IACHR ruling will not be accepted

So Chavez decided that his fear of Leopoldo Lopez was more than whatever international consequences he would face if he did not follow the ruling of the Inter American Court on Human Rights, IACHR.  Today the Venezuelan high court, TSJ, decided to ignore the IACHR ruling on the same grounds that it used a few moths ago at San Jose, grounds that were deemed not acceptable by the IACHR.

For those late in the game the IACHR ruled, in a proceeding that involved the Venezuelan state at every level, that Leopoldo Lopez (and hundreds with him) could not be barred from running for office on a mere administrative sanction, that for that a crime had to be committed and that such crime had to be sanctioned by a court of justice, not some bureaucrat following orders from above.  For the TSJ to use the arguments it presented at the trial to dismiss the ruling is, to say the least, childish and will not impress jurists of the world whatsoever: if you agree to participate in a trial you also agree to abide by the ruling.  Period.

It is too early to figure out the far reaching implications of this ruling of the TSJ which, besides being unconstitutional, places Venezuela squarely on the position to have to break its hemispheric treaties, namely the treaties of membership with the OAS and Mercosur for starters.

In other words Chavez's regime has decided on a high stakes bluffing game and it is for the other countries of the hemisphere to decide whether they will accept such a disregard for norms established over decades.  Accepting Chavez bluff today is EXACTLY as accepting Hitler's bluff at Munich.  It means, immediately, that Chavez will cheat in next years elections to make sure he wins no matter what.  It means that once a Human Right is deliberately violated, then it is easier to violate all sort of human rights, as needed.  It means that the remaining media in Venezuela can be silenced once and for all if necessary.

It means that the Chavez regime has declared publicly to the world today that it is a dictatorship, that it will do as it pleases from now on, that no treaty can rein its actions.  Notice has been served, will people open the envelope?

It is the time to chose between Chamberlain and Churchill, whomever they are today in DC, Brasilia, Buenos Aires, Asuncion, Mexico DC, Panama, Bogota, etc...


4 comments:

  1. Juan Cristóbal4:57 PM

    Oh, but Daniel, it gets more interesting. Now we have Luisa Estella saying he *can* participate in elections, he *can* register as a candidate. But if he wins... they don't know if they'll let him take charge.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Expected.

    Now.... clue me in... who's the other side in the ruling? Chamberlin wasn't much but he had the spine to understand his FU and resign. There is no counter party here... just a mish mash of of weak treaties, I don't see the down side for Hugo. IMF problems?

    ReplyDelete
  3. jc

    post coming :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. half empty

    the oas treaties are clear and chavez signed them. the iachr ruling even refers to them.

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers