Thursday, February 09, 2012

An endorsement, an apology to the MUD, and predictions with a review

Thus it is time to round up the primary 2012 series of posts, reserving the label for a few more posts until late next week, as results are commented.  Three items in this post..

The first thing that I need to write is that in spite of all my fears the MUD-UNIDAD has managed the process much better than expected.  With so many landmines on the way, it is a miracle that we have come this far and that the perspectives are rather good for February 13, and beyond.  All is not played, though, many mistakes will need to be corrected such as having primaries for mayor MORE THAN ONE YEAR before the actual election.  But in all truth, if Chavez is reelected voting for mayors in 2013 will be sort of pointless.  Thus this is sort of an apology to some of my criticism to the MUD in the past 6 months.  But other criticisms still stand, just in case.

The second item is that before I write my endorsement it is important to summarize the primary campaign that is finishing in barely 48 hours.  First, we need to underline the historical importance of what has happened, something almost without precedent, besides maybe the "concertación" in Chile.  A democratic opposition going from the democratic left to more right wing sentiment has managed to carry a process that indicate a clear mandate for whomever wins next Sunday, no matter what the vote counts yields.  Here, the mandate is for the winner to reestablish democracy in Venezuela, to repair the structure of the state.  Never in our history we have faced such a challenge.  Even Punto Fijo did not have to face such a daunting task because Perez Jimenez was not into destroying the structures of the state, merely appropriating them.  Chavez has been bent on destroying the state to replace it by his lone will.  Period.

The other salient historical fact is the fast modernization of our politics.  That such a primary was held, that for the first time there were so many debates (even if incomplete and sometimes unsatisfactory), that all candidates had to submit themselves to such a battery of interviews, talk shows and assorted questioning is a novelty for us.  This has had the side benefit to expose crudely the arrogance that wraps today chavismo, uncountable to any but Chavez.  As a master class of democracy in a country that truly never experienced it, we have to thank the MUD and the candidates that decided to play the new game in town.  Their legacy, to the 5 of them, including Leopoldo Lopez, including those that did not manage to sing up for diverse reasons, including those at local level that accepted some form of questioning, will be bearing its fruits in the years to come.

PREDICTION: considering the positive spirit that the Unidad and its candidates have manged to create I think that we should cross easily the 2 million vote barrier.  That will be a stunning success, no matter what chavismo may say after the fact, the more so that they have no primary whatsoever planned.

And we reach the time to endorse for VN&V.  But before  I do so, we need to review the pro and con of each candidate even if in earlier post I already discarded some of them.

Diego Arria

Arria had the best proposal, the one that made the most sense, the one that all the other candidates will have to rally at some point, the one that the winner will have to face soon in his term if elected.  Arria told us that there is not such a thing as the state anymore, just a crowd of corrupt hanger on that do whatever Chavez and his colonial masters in Havanna dictate.  For him it is impossible to restore the republic without refunding it through a constitutional assembly that will remove all of these people who may be legal but who have long ceased to be legitimate.

Arria also added that he would be a transition president, for no more than three years, willing to pay the political price for the needed changes.  And if that was excellent and even visionary, it was also his undoing.  Arria never felt the need to propose a real transition program, using the excuse that he could not promise anything until he knew in which shape the country will be at inauguration time.  That did not fly with the electorate and he was never able to capitalize on his political stunts, from sending Chavez accusation to The Hague tribunal, to call for a constituent assembly.  He should have bothered to at least establish some priorities to try in his three year term, something like that: "I cannot promise anything 'cause we may be broke by February 2013.  But if there is some cash left somewhere I will try to do at least this, this and that".  By the time he started mentioning some stuff it was too late in the campaign and only hard core anti chavistas were still interested in listening to him.

PREDICTION: 5% top, beating Medina only.  However with a low participation, less than 1.5 million, he could well climb to 10% as his electorate is certainly the most motivated one.


Henrique Capriles

If Arria had the clearest, more realistic proposal of all, Capriles had the best campaign.  He started first, long before anyone else, proving he had planned for a long time his run and that he had his act together.  Then he kept a steady pace, kept his message coherent, built  relevant alliances and eventually brought on his side a candidate that really could bring a nice dowry to the union.

The problem with Capriles is the nature of his message.  He run a campaign that could pay off in October, that should be run for October.  As such he shot his best guns and now the enemy knows his strategy.  The message of Capriles was one of reconciliation, of working together, to attract the contractual chavista voter, the one that votes for interest.  Either that voter would not be afraid to switch to Capriles as early as February, or may at least stay home in October instead of going out to vote for a Chavez s/he does not like but is afraid of.  It paid off as he is leading in the polls, but it remains to see what will happen now that Chavez will focus on him.  But my main worry is not what will happen before October 7 but what will happen after.  After a non confrontational campaign if Capriles wins he will have no mandate to stare down chavista "institutions" that will be sabotaging his actions from day one.  There is the possibility that his victory could actually make things worse in the long term as a violent chavismo, defeated and bitter, will not be afraid of his perceived blandness.  His rather easy primary victory may actually make his October campaign more difficult than what it needs to be.

PREDICTION: based on suspicious but not necessarily wrong polls, based on "as seen on TV" rallies, Capriles will win next Sunday.  But I give him at most 50%, which is very good, which gives him all the legitimacy he needs to represent the opposition.  Still, the electorate is significantly fickle at this point while many have come out to endorse Perez (Tal Cual journalists at large, for example).  Thus he may win but by not much more than 40%.  My final word: 45%, if participation does not go above 2 million.  If it goes above that then it means that some chavistas are voting, and doing it for him, pushing him to 50%.

Maria Corina Machado

Without any contest, she was the winner in brain and wonkishness.  In all debates she had the razor sharp mind at all times whereas all of the other candidates at one point or another were fuzzy, unfocused, avoiding, etc..  pretending maybe to be dumber than what they really are.  That is, she may not have "won" every debate, but she was consistently up there. It became clear that the woman is able to be the president, to manage the country and to stare down chavismo as needed.  And she demonstrated that by getting the best line of the campaign, the moment that we will all remember 10 years from now, when she publicly told Chavez that his regime is a gang of thieves.  But more importantly she was the lone candidate with a deep vision of change, not merely of fixing up Chavez mistakes.  Maybe her vision is not applicable until someone like Arria resets the counters, but at least for the first time since I can remember a credible politician was able to expose a new possible vision for the country, away from soon 60 years of the crassest populism that Latin America experienced outside the PRI long tenure in Mexico or the Peronista zombie still kicking in Argentina.

But she was not able, and maybe worse, unwilling, to confront her weaknesses which casts a doubt about her political flair.  Her campaign was good and bad at the same time.  She waited for too long to officially launch her run, hoping until the very end to have the backing of some political machinery.  When she failed at it she pretended to be a strictly an independent candidate.  Maybe that could have worked but it did not.  Running in Venezuela today without the minimum machinery is simply impossible.  The example of Leopoldo is here for all: he started from nothing by building first a small but efficient machinery, Voluntad Popular.  Then all wanted his body and he was able to trade high.  She certainly did not have time to build her own machinery but she refused to pretend she would be building one, assuming that her presence and brain were enough.  They were not in a country where most workers from any campaign expect something in exchange, even if they are willing to accept that it may take years.  Even that long ahead promise was denied by Machado to his potential followers. Yesterday she still refused to talk about a post February 12 organization of her following into some political relevance.  Now voters are going to force her to build an electoral movement.

PREDICTION: difficult.  I think she should get at least 10%.  If she does, she will have a future, if she does not, well, back to a honorable career at the National Assembly.  Like Arria, the less the voters Sunday the better her chances to cross 10%.

Pablo Medina

Medina deserves the "most improved award.  That is, Medina has shown that you could overcome humble origins, a mean trade union past, and learn to think and understand that we all need to work together, the state, the workers, the business owners.  On this respect maybe Medina is the one that brought the most to the campaign and he deserves a special mention and at least my gratitude.

However, not having a campaign worth discussing (he was the one with the lowest means of all), not being focused enough in debates (he tends still to be too dispersed in his argumentation) give him no chance whatsoever.  Yet, I will not rule it out for him to get a 2-3% of the votes as some workers may want to vote for him, either from the Chavez or anti Chavez camp, to make sure their voices are heard after February 12.


Pablo Perez

Poor Pablo Perez....  6 months ago he looked like a formidable candidate but too many mistakes along the way undid him, in spite of owning the largest state of Venezuela, and the most endorsements as far as I can tell.  If the Capriles campaign may make it to the text books for what to do, the one of Perez will also make it for what not to do.  He started late and with lots of difficulty since Rosales wanted a go.  Thus his leadership started with a tiny wound.  Then he delayed further as he actively sought the endorsement of allegedly electoral machinery parties such as AD and COPEI.  And then he started a campaign under the same themes as Capriles, but after Capriles had had 3 months to make his case.  Capriles was already leading him by 10 points and that never shrunk, with a tendency to increase as Perez was as underwhelming in debates as Capriles was.

And yet Perez had a lot to go for him.  He is of a more popular origin than the other guys except for Medina and thus is able to connect better with "el pueblo".  On paper, just with Zulia's state, he has half the votes needed for the nomination.  Supposedly another 25% was ensured by his neighboring states, so he had less votes to seek out than the other guys.  He has not been a bad governor, considering the intense sabotage and attacks he has been subjected to by the regime.  And he was able to offer a more genuine social democrat vision than the one offered by Capriles which some times is hard to swallow by some (such as yours truly).  And he is able to adapt his message better than the other guys, finding for example the right touch to reach out for the more hard core opposition, when needed.  But the campaign errors were too much, I am afraid that even his latest push will not be enough.

PREDICTION: although a last minute surge is always possible, he should not get much more than a 30% of the votes.  And even if the vaunted machinery plays in the end, his eventual victory over Capriles could never be more than by a meager 2 or 3 points.  His latest harsher position on Chavez may be to late to carve into Machado and Arria while it makes sure that most putative chavista votes will go to Capriles.  Thus a higher participation, more than 2 millions, is not a guarantee that the machinery is actually playing in his favor.  I would give him 40% at best, if all coalesces miraculously at the last minute with a tad of  an "all against Capriles" attitude which I am not seeing, and that pretty much was voided when "Capoldo" was born..

Endorsement

First, I must stress that I never intended to decide my vote before the very end.  That is, I wanted and I have enjoyed this campaign immensely and was NEVER in any urge to pick a favorite even if readers were aware of my sympathies for Leopoldo Lopez.  But with his withdrawal I was back into the search, though having discarded already Capriles, Medina and Perez.  Before I tell you my final choice and why, you must know that whomever wins Sunday will find me as his firm defender, and apologist if needed.  By March any new reader to this blog may be forgiven to think that I am a dye hard fan of the winner.

My final choice is a compromise between principles and pragmatism, made easier by the all but certain victory of Capriles, which victory margin will be owed to Lopez.  Thus I do not need to vote for them, knowing that they will do well, that they do not need my vote and thus satisfying my inborn repulsion to any concept of voting for the winner, eating what everyone else does, etc...  Once a "different drummer" always a different one.  That they are more than likely going to win will only make my transition to support Capriles easier, much easier, than supporting Perez for October 7.

I will not vote for Arria even though I personally know him and I know he is right.  Oh so right....  But his campaign has raised concerns in me in that it is not enough to be right, you also need to project that you have a fighting chance to prove it.  I never saw that in the campaign even though I know he had it in him.

And thus my vote will go for Maria Corina Machado with the hope that she will use it for the best, that she will force Capriles not to compromise too much his message, that she will create a valid modern right option for Venezuela, what we sorely need in politics.  And this is written by a Liberal in the US sense, an agnostic perturbed by some religious stands of Machado.  But also someone that is keenly aware that it is our history of populism that has killed all real political debate, denied any alternative, and thus that has allowed a monstrosity like Chavez to pass.

The message of Maria Corina Machado is that it is possible to build an alternative but that we need to work on it, accept defeats before victories.  If she succeeds, no matter where we stand on the political spectrum we will be better off  for it, because only when there is true political debate and true choices do we avoid the fate of chavismo or peronismo which are never a choice but an escape route for the weak minded.

May she prove me right.



40 comments:

  1. I hope you all appreciate my discretion at not putting the name of my endorsement in the title.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've been leaning in a similar direction, Daniel. For I suspect that Capoldo will win on 12F. Yet, the country needs, no the country desperately needs MCM's voice. Not just now, but for many years to come. While she is not a seasoned enough politician for my expectations, I hope my intentions (and that of others) provide the signal that she needs to prepare herself for a much bigger platform in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:56 PM

    She is the best of the pack, un rato largo...

    However, I think we still need her at the AN, poking Hugo's eye time after time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now that was really something Daniel.Your well reasoned and ethical stance on the issue is A#1 .

    "because only when there is true political debate and true choices do we avoid the fate of chavismo or peronismo which are never a choice but an escape route for the weak minded"


    Brilliant analysis.Just perfect.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great post, Daniel. I also congratulate the MUD for a job well done so far. I'm very optimistic about this Sunday.

    As you, I waited until the end of the campaign to make my choice. The options narrowed to 2: HCR and MCM. HCR not just wins the "electability" argument, but also is the best combination of youth and experience. I like him a lot and I know he will be the best candidate on October 7th.

    But I want to vote for the person who better represents my views and not just for the one who can defeat Chavez. In the end, I'm going with MCM. Her performance in the debates shows that she's ready for the task. She offered a clear contrast with her opponents on policy and values. My vote for her is a vote to build a new political option for the country. I hope that no matter what's her result on Sunday, this is only the beginning for her.

    About the others, Diego Arria missed a huge opportunity to leave a mark in the campaign. Pablo Perez is for me the worst of all the choices, but I still vote for him on October of I have to. Pablo Medina was just a distraction, even if he represents a fogotten sector of the country who deserves more attention. Leopoldo offered good ideas and brought some fresh air to the campaign, but the "inhabilitacion" element hurt his chances. The way he endorsed HCR was a great demostration of political wisdom.

    I concurr that at least 2 million will go to vote. I dare to say that 2.5 million is not impossible. If by surprise, it's more than that then the sky's the limit and Chavez will be very worried.

    For all readers: If you're still undecided about going to vote or you know anyone who's not sure, I can only tell you that voting this time is as important as in next October.

    History will be made this Sunday, be part of it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:44 PM

    I highly agree with your comments and decisions. We need somebody a woman in a high position that we can feel proud of, unlike those that we have/had in the last few years. I would like to see her as the Foreign Relations Minister if she does not win the primaries. Even better, all 5 should form part of the new government after next year...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm told that employees in the state owned who won't vote out of fear of their names showing up on something equivalent to the Tascon list. Hopefully this isn't widespread but it does show another downside to nationalization.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sorry, my post should have said "...state owned industries won't..."

      Delete
  8. kernel_panic10:32 PM

    As Daniel and firepigette, I'm all about MCM for the reasons mentioned above

    but, ghosts haunt my mind yelling "PP might win" and that just creeps me out, I know that is not very likely...

    At least, since my mom went from LL to MCM, it's not that bad if I go HCR :p it would be a switcheroo :p

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous3:48 AM

    Don't worry Panic, everybody and their mother are voting for MCM.

    She will win, and she will make us all want to work again for this mesmerizing country of ours that -no matter how many times it lets us down by its populist and corrupt ways- always comes back with new, fresh hope.

    May she prove us right.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous6:24 AM

    My vote is for MCM

    ReplyDelete
  11. MCM ran the most compelling campaign, and, other things being equal, deserves to win the primary.

    She can't win the general elction, though. Capriles can.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Juan Cristóbal9:14 AM

    Boy, you sure do beat around the bush, I had to scroll all the way down to get to your endorsement!

    I think you made a wise, consistent choice. Not my choice, but a respectable one nonetheless.

    And come Monday, unidad!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would it be naive to expect the losers campaigning for the winner after 12F? I would love to see MCM, DA and PM and the runner-up giving not only the usual half-arsed endorsement to the winner, but full support in the coming months. That would be great!

      Delete
    2. The latest ad of Perez should put your mind at peace. I was impressed by his detachment and his, shall we say, statesman ship. Why did he keep this hidden for so long?

      Delete
    3. JC

      Once Leopoldo dropped there was no way I could offer a ringing, enthusiastic endorsement. I had to think about it and it was important for me, and maybe for some readers, to explain the thought process, the more so to make believable my conversion to capoldismo next Monday :)

      Also, it was the perfect time to put 2-3 posts together to wrap up the primary coverage :P

      Delete
  13. If it all comes down to debate performance, I believe that MCM should win and that HRC and PP are still green behind the ears. However, based on experience and likeability, I guess HRC and/or PP have a better chance to win in October.

    MCM seens pretty smart, but her time has not come yet. If she plays her cards well she may as well be our first lady president. I can picture that in the not so distant future...

    Miguel Salazar is predicting a tight race between PP and HRC. His numbers: PP 40.4%; HRC 37.4%; MCM 10.4%; PM 7.8% and DA 4%.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Miguel Salazar? Really? Just the fact that he gives Pablo Medina almost 8% discredits him.

      Delete
    2. Miguel Salazar has an agenda and uses the polls that best suit him. He never gave up the idea that he would become the regime's favorite journalist. Meanwhile he is in bed with those at Tal Cual et al with direct or indirect endorsements of Perez. Nothing wrong with it, but Teodoro is up front with it whereas Salazar tries to be in good terms with both good and evil.

      Delete
    3. I can imagine Salazar trying to cover all the angles, just in case. He's a survivor after all. I personally believe that he is an egotistical I-told-you-so I-always-know-best kind of guy. Given that he has not that big of an impact out there, I don't see how anyone - i.e. P.P. - can benefit from that.

      I see this poll under the same light as the other polls out there. At most, it paints the best case scenario for PP. Time will tell if he's right or not.

      Delete
    4. Yes, that 8% for PM made me raise my eyebrow too. I'm quite sure that sunday night we're gonna have a good laugh at Miguel Salazar's expense...

      Delete
    5. To A. Barreda: Touche. LOL.

      Delete
  14. If we are absolutely sure that Capoldo will win, regardless of renegade votes from well-informed voters like Daniel, then Ok, let's vote for whomever we personally like best. I would also vote, in this case, for MCM for similar reasons.

    And what I mean by that, is that the main purpose here is to dethrone Chavez. The rest is secondary, almost irrelevant. And the Capoldo ticket undoubtedly has the best chance at doing so. When they win this Sunday, we should all support them 100%, as Daniel suggests.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I just read a commenter somewhere else saying his vote would go to PP because he has a wife and children.

    Hey, if that is what's important to that person that's ok, as long and he goes and votes!

    What has to be clear to everybody is that Chavez is going to charge hard against the winner, and the only way to resist is to remain united (it reminds me a scene from "Gladiator"). Chavez has been waiting for a slip, for the confrontation between candidates to highlight it, but they haven't given him the chance, and that has been a very good thing.

    Whoever wins will need the support of the others, but I believe this is something they already know.

    I also believe that Capriles, if he wins, might change the tone and charge more frontally against the government. He already started.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And it is going to get uglier. Not only HCR is not married (though he had notorious affairs) but he is jewish!!! they are converts but wait until the campaign starts and chavismo anti semitism comes up......

      Delete
    2. Yeah. I have read many comments about him being single too. they are quickly dismissed by the fact the the supreme master is also single.
      I read someone writing "better to be single than divorced twice because of beating the wife".
      BTW, HCR is not jewish. His father is catholic and his mom is jewish, and he was raised catholic. He explained it in an interview with Venevision, but I don't seem to find it right now.

      Delete
    3. Carolina

      I wrote converts. The Capriles came to America via the Netherlands (names ending in -es are often of Sefardi origin, while the -ez finish is not). They have been Christian for a few generations already. But Radonski is a more recent conversion. They fled Europe you know when though I do not whether his mom was Christian from birth or converted for her wedding.

      Delete
    4. Here it is:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vcFmA7l6yCc

      Delete
  16. Daniel,

    I have said that about Capriles before but got a lot of flak for saying so... on another blog.

    Not all of the Capriles have converted but some have.Anti- Semite Fascists don't care if they are converted or not...


    I must say though Capriles does have one good thing going for him in that he was NOT endorsed by Petkoff :)

    ReplyDelete
  17. I thought Daniel's timing was perfect.

    But more important than the timing of a write-up is the voting by bloggers who have been advocating, even exhorting others of going to the polls.

    Daniel, have you got dual nationality? Will you be voting on 12F?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'm glad to see that Capriles had some notorious affairs. I mean, if you're going to go to the trouble of having an affair, seeking the notorious route is the only way to go :-D

    I look forward, as will quite likely Capriles, to the anti-semitism from the chavista camp.

    Good grief, I'd be more worried about his marianismo (the kind that turns into a vacant look in the eyes, say, when making an important decision for the country) than I would any ancestral vestige of Judaism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh dear.... I am in full agreement with you on that one. Never mind a few opus dei hanging around PJ.....

      And I agree also with you on the notorious :) I wish I could take the credit of that one....

      Delete
    2. I also agree.

      But so many venezuelans actually like that, that is scary.

      I know my gocha ex mom-in-law from La Grita y el Santo Cristo, would say that he is a "buen muchacho" becuase of that, y hasta le regalaria una estampita bendita y todo.

      Delete
    3. Juan Cristóbal4:03 PM

      Yeah, nothing scarier than believing in La Divina Pastora. Hell, those bumpkins from Maracaibo even named their airport after La Chinita. Scary, scary.

      Delete
    4. i dunno no nobody from maracucholand. but i heard they get glazed eyes and clouded minds "cuando van cruzar el puente"

      Delete
    5. Not maracucholand, Daniel. Maracuchistan.

      Delete
  19. Milonga2:26 PM

    May she prove you right. Daniel, I wouldn't expect anything else from you. Thanks! This type of stuff is why I'm a fan of VN&V! Looking forward to Sunday!

    ReplyDelete
  20. la Divina Pastora, la Virgen del Valle, or whatever conduit helps HCR through the day. Ojo, when I mentioned my concern over his marianismo, I was referring to the type tomado muy a pecho. And I've seen that at different times of my life, in different locations, among one or many. To pretend that zealots do not exist, in any religion, goes to a certain delusion. To build a fortress against discussions of this type goes to defensiveness.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous4:39 PM

    Excellent post!
    Also quite interesting that a guy on the left (US) recognizes the need for a movement on the right. Very humble of you. MCM is my favorite too :-)
    -KS

    ReplyDelete
  22. Some Religious Stands of MCM?(What do You Mean by That? Is She Social Conservative?)

    I am Catholic Filipino who Sympathies with The Convergencia,but Wants MCM to Win!

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers