The first thing to note is that there is really nothing new. Then again the report is signed by two Venezuelans so that would explain why it is complete enough (Alejandro Arreaza and Alejandro Grisanti). What they try to do is to figure what will happen after October 7, even including the scenario where there is no election on October 7 due to X.
...if Chavez or a chavista wins the election, there are questions that will need to be addressed. We question whether 1) they realize the need for reforms is probably unavoidable; 2) how they would maintain an exchange rate control that producesThere, common sense. And there is also this, almost money quote quality:
incentives to import rather than produce domestically; and 3) who could be the
minister that can implement this set of reform.
We believe that an HCR-led government would implement reforms gradually, focusing
on fixing relative prices and eliminating exchange and price control. We would expect
this path of reform to be fully supported by the international markets and with very
strong capital inflows. In this case, an adjustment will not be necessary and the new
government will have the opportunity to focus on maintaining the purchasing power of
the poorest sector of the population.
In light of the unprecedented oil windfall, the presidential period 2007 to present could be characterized as a very poor in terms of economic performance. Venezuela’s economic policy is not sustainable and creates uncertainty about the future if the current regime wins the election in October 2012. It is not clear what changes it would introduce, apart from a very strong devaluationThen there is a whole bunch of data with this conclusion (that sort of data has been managed in diverse guise by Miguel and I hate redundancy)
This figure reflects that social indicators are not improving at the rate that they should, given this unprecedented oil windfall.More numbers about the fiscal situation of Venezuela, on how borrowing in the midle of the crisis aggravates everything. The conclusion:
This fiscal path is not sustainable, and a strong correction needs to be made. We believe that this adjustment would be very painful if Chavez party remains in power, given its lack of support from the Venezuelan private sector and international capital markets. The only possible adjustment for the administration is a significant devaluation of the currency, which would have a contractionary effect over the economy
In other words, over and over, we are in trouble.
As for the election, the observation is pretty close to what I wrote last Sunday on Capriles launch, as to the improved chances or a more peaceful transition:
Chavez will be subject to very strong limitations, and we believe that he will repeat what he has done in the past three months: a few appearances trying to show him as healthy despite his medical condition. The president’s principal assets for the campaign will be money, but he will be unable to “touch” the voters. By contrast, Capriles is promising to travel across the country four times before October 7. If we add this face-to-face campaign with the opposition message that is addressing the real problems of Venezuela, the probability of a peaceful and a democratic transition in Venezuela could be higher that what the market is pricing.
"the market is pricing"... you gotta love that consulting language...