Monday, March 01, 2010

Chavez Venezuela: a repressive country, a haven for terrorists and drug smugglers

Today was a terrible day for Chavez. [UPDATED 1 & 2]

First it started with a judge in Spain emitting an indictment that states among other things that ETA terrorists get cover and help just as the FARC ones do, in Venezuela.  While there, they plotted killing two Colombian presidents as well as other Colombian figures. There goes the constant Chavez complaints that all want to kill him.

The Spanish governments are always serious when they deal with Basque separatist threats of the ETA, and the current one is no exception even if it tried at first to engage the Basque early in its tenure.  Today active collaboration with French police has weakened the ETA to an historical low.  Zapatero government is not going to dodge that issue which single handedly could bring his government down.  Diplomatically they asked Venezuela to account for itself.  and we can sure that if the response is not adequate, Moratinos for all his Chavez love will have to take action.  And so goes the Spanish connection, the last one Chavez still had in Europe.

Why you may ask?  Well, the first reaction of the regime is not very encouraging.  Assuming that all the judicial systems of the world are submitted tot he executive will, as is the case in Venezuela, they accuse  the Spanish judge to make politics and find unacceptable the ruling.  Of course, just as for the IACHR report, we see wholesale rejection, and not the flimsiest attempt at rebuttal.

The rest of the day would bring further bad news to finish off Venezuela's image overseas.

The Washington Post did hit with a very strong editorial about the latest IACHR report that says that in Venezuela there is no separation of power, that the failure of the knee bent judicial power are the sources of moist of our evils.  It is worth to quote the last paragraph

To read the report is to be dismayed anew by the silence of Venezuela's neighbors and of the principal OAS organs. Mr. Insulza, characteristically, responded to the report with an arms-length statement that underlined the commission's autonomy and suggested "dialogue" between it and Mr. Chávez's government "to clear up doubts and differences." Mr. Insulza is running for reelection as secretary general, so far without opposition; the United States supplies 60 percent of his budget. If his reaction to the report is any indication, Congress will be expected to fund OAS tolerance of Mr. Chávez's repression for five more years.

And sure enough we get later in the day a bipartisan request to the US representative at the OAS to start a discussion on this report, signed by Lugar and Dodd.  Cannot ignore it....

Bad timing for Chavez because the criticism of Lula and the rest of Latin America about the murder of Zapata in a Cuban jail has been noted and is stinging.  Could it be that the US (and Canada?) want to play hardball and expose the real reasons why these creeps want an OAS without the US and Canada?  Is it an early bluff calling?

And these two above items were not enough, the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) comes out saying that due to corruption and laxity Venezuela has become a main transit route for drugs.  I was listening to Beatriz de Majo on Alo Ciudadano a little bit ago.  She claims that she does not believe that there a policy for Chavez and the Venezuelan army to promote drug trafficking.  However, she also said that as long as the regime keeps harboring and helping people like the ELN or the FARC, drug trafficking will exist and corrupt the country further.  Which ties up nicely the end of this post with the way it started.

Special treat today: all references in English!


Update!  And in Spanish, sorry!

Chavez had another one of those "famous last words" moments.  Since he cannot refute any of the accusations his regime has been subjected to, he and his sycophants, shoot the messenger.  Tonight we have a classic.  He called the actions of the Spanish judge, "left overs of colonial past", rezagos de pasado colonial. And then he added in his newly found royal style ("¡expropiese!"):  'condenadme. La historia me absolverá' condemn me, history will absolve me!  Which is, now that I think of it, Castro-Royal, though much less thrilling than the original one who had at least had flair for these things.

We need to make a short pause here to meditate on the conception of justice for chavismo.  This is not the first time that Chavez dismisses foreign courts.  The other day the French government had to let Chavez know concerning his wishes the see freed the noted terrorist Carlos, the Jackal, that the French government would not dream to question a court decision even if they disagreed with it.  Same thing in Spain where the adventures of Garzon and Pinochet where rather an embarrassment for the government but where it let Garzon go ahead anyway, to our great delight today as he started a trend that we hope irreversible: Human Rights violators cannot hide forever.

Of course the idea that Chavez could end up in some international court someday must be bothering him, but what I detect is something else: utter misunderstanding, and thus disregard for justice, thug/mafia style.  Justice must be controlled, bought, tamed, whatever, but is not to be considered as an equal ever, or even a need that could well be convenient in the future.  Such people live in the present and justice for them represents a memory of a past they want to forget, and an obstacle to a future that they want to control.  Observe that in Venezuela not only the judicial system (as well as the legislative one) chases after Chavez to "legalize" whatever decision he made on the spur of some TV show, to the point of having the High Court chief question the need for separation of powers.  Without having the courtesy to resign from her job to show that she lives by her standards and values.

That is why I have always said that I do not wish whatsoever Chavez's death: he looks forward becoming a martyr if he must since he will get at least his face on t-shirts the world around (though he is cowardly enough that he would chose jail over death, even a sure life sentence in, say, Miami a la Noriega).  I want Chavez in jail as soon as possible and for the rest of his days.  That is the very best punishment we can met on him.

Update 2, next day.

PMB has come up with a nice summary of all of these accusations-  No wonder Chavez prefers to plead insanity!  I suppose that in his case it is worth trying.......

Our very own Alek Boyd, imagine that!, already had told us long ago about ETA FARC collusion in Venezuela.


  1. There's an old belief that people accuse out of being guilty for the same thing. This comes to mind with regard to all of Chavez' assassination attempts on his life while the whole time he's supporting plans to assassinate others.

  2. sheik yer bouti6:24 AM

    did I miss something? was there a mass migration of the animals from South Central Los Angeles to Conception, Chile?

  3. Boludo Tejano12:43 PM

    The other day the French government had to let Chavez know concerning his wishes the see the noted terrorist Carlos, the Jackal, that the French government would not dream to question a court decision even if they disagreed with it.

    That decision by the French government is not exactly within Thugo's frame of reference. His reaction: WTF? You mean judges don't have to follow El Presidente's orders?

    Daniel, your paragraph on Thugo's conception of justice, past and future, is a masterpiece. When future historians want to describe justice in the Chavez era, they could do no better than to quote that paragraph. Which somehow reminds me of the ghosts of Christmas past and future from Charles Dickens's Christmas Carol. WTF?

    Sheik: WTF?

  4. Boludo

    Thanks. I went to review to see what you liked about it and found some mistakes now corrected. Now I am better than Dickens :)

    As for sheik WTF. He sometimes considers the comment section as an open ended forum. I let it go by because in a way it showed that he thought better of Chileans than Angelenos. Why? I prefer not to look further.

  5. 1979 Boat People1:48 PM

    Venezuela plotted to kill Colombia president, Spain judge says

  6. Anonymous6:53 PM

    I would have avoided a link that in turn links to Sumate...

  7. anonymous

    why? what? where?

  8. Boludo Tejano9:11 PM

    Thugo’s 'condenadme. La historia me absolverá' ..condemn me, history will absolve me! is definitely derivative of Castro’s speech at his trial. It appears that Castro’s speech, at least its ending, was derivative of Hitler’s speech at the 1924 trial for his failed putsch attempt.

    In Georgie Ann Geyer’s autobiography, Buying the Night Flight , she points out that Castro’s speech at his trial for his failed attempt was derivative of Hitler’s speech at the trial for his failed putsch attempt. She also points out that as an adolescent, Fidel had a liking for European fascists.Geyer appears to be the only one who qoutes Castro as saying that “The goddess of history will absolve me.” At least from a computer I cannot find her source. (Georgie Ann Geyer, now retired, was a foreign correspondent who specialized in Latin America. She spoke German, Spanish, and Russian in the pursuit of the news.)

    This is the usually cited Castro quote : “Condemn me. It does not matter. History will absolve me.”

    Compare it to Hitler: “Pronounce us guilty a thousand times over: the goddess of the eternal court of history will smile. She will acquit us.”

    Seems derivative to me, even without “goddess of history.”

  9. Boludo, you're right on the money. Castro's "la historia me absolvera" comes from Hitler. Watch the documentary:

    The quote comes from the Fuhrer. More here.

  10. What I find remarkable is how separate investigations like the IACHR and the Spanish judge both happened to coincide in a way that is mutually reinforcing.

    It is disgusting of Insulza to suggest that IACHR and Chavez should "clear up doubts and differences" as if it were a matter of a slight misunderstanding between these parties, just something to be corrected by some " dialogue".Insulza's cynicism is shocking,and now he is running unopposed as if he'd done such a great job that nobody can run against him.

  11. Boludo Tejano1:53 PM

    Coche de Fuego a la Chapina, a.k.a. Firepiggette: Insulza is not being cynical at all. He is a socialist idealist,a hard-core survivor of the Allende years. Most of the Chilean left now realizes that Allende tried to take Chile in a direction that the majority of Chileans were opposed to, as shown by the Declaration the Chamber of Deputies passed 3 weeks before the coup. Insulza belongs to the hard-core left who believe that if not for the CIA, Allende would have successfully completed his socialist agenda.Anything that advances that program is good to Insulza; thus his support of Thugo.

  12. BT,

    I know that Insulza is a left wing Chavez supporter, but I find the way he handled the situation cynical.

    He didn't defend Chavez openly, but pretended that the problem could be solved through dialogue whereas it is simply a matter of Chavez abusing human rights.It is not a matter that can be solved by dialogue.
    Dialogue has no place in this situation.Chavez simply needs to stop abusing human rights.


Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the fourth day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the basic rules. I will be ruthless in erasing, as well as those who replied to any off rule comment.

Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez/chavismo blog, Readers have made up their minds long ago. Trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.