Sunday, November 24, 2013

The official 2013 VNV municipal election post

I suppose I should not break a long and on occasion distinguished electoral number crunching tradition. Even though elections have become a test of will rather than any democratic exercise it still matters that we look at the electoral considerations and perspectives. Even if diffidently.   Thus this general and as brief as possible unique electoral post about what are not necessarily the main races to watch but rather those that should confirm the trend as to the waning of chavismo. Outside, of course, the ever present crass electoral fraud.

The conditions

The municipal elections of December 8 have turned out to become a referendum on Maduro's tenure.  It should not have been like this of course, since we are supposed to vote for the guy that we think is better at fixing potholes and picking up the garbage. But in a country where a mass expects only goodies and another mass resent populism and the accompanying sectarianism you cannot expect anything else but plebiscitary polarization, the more so that the Maduro "election" of last April is now established as fraudulent by any impartial observer.

The electoral board has done its homework. The Maduro camp is amply favored, from gerrymandering of many a council district, to an absolute blind eye on power abuse, from using the resources of the state as if nothing to legally bar as many candidates as possible that could win a given district away from chavismo. In addition the flaws amply documented last April, from dead people voting to guarantees that the vote will be secret have been ignored. The CNE is more than ever the Ministry of Chavistas to be Reelected.

Yet we need to go and vote. Firstly, it is either voting or taking a gun and start a guerrilla warfare. Voting does not imply meek acceptance of adverse fraudulent results, but if you do not bother to vote you cannot complain afterwards. So we need to have the election stolen from us in order to be allowed to bitch about it. It may be unfair but this is the way things work in the real world.

Secondly the situation is not that desperate. After all, the more we vote, the more we set up systems to defend our vote, the more difficult it is for the regime to cheat. We need to force the regime to go to an outright open vote stealing to have international opinion become less complacent. Not that they will send Marines or Legionaires, but no democrat will want to be seen with a fraud. In case you have not noticed it, Maduro is only received by his pariah colleagues, real democrats limit as much as possible exposure to the post Chavez cancer.

What I am trying to say here is that the nature of the CNE fraud is to improve the chavismo numbers by somewhere close to 5%. That is, the day chavismo gets in real life less than 45% it will not be able to claim a majority and the CNE will have no option but to announce that the opposition has 50,1% or more. Which would mean that it got at least 55% . If the real numbers are never announced it will not matter, the psychological earthquake of a losing chavismo should be enough to speed up the collapse of the regime.

This is why the regime has gone on overdrive in recent weeks reaching for the organized looting and destruction of commerce in the country.  All polls pre-looting were implying that Maduro candidates were at least 10 points behind the opposition MUD, and sliding. Furthermore, contrary to Chavez good old days, Maduro does little, if any, direct candidate support: he is toxic.  If Maduro is 10 points behind it means that when cheating is factored in chavismo loses 52 to 48 in favor of the MUD.

I personally doubt that the latest antics of the regime are going to favor chavismo much. At best it will energize chavismo bases but I doubt it will be enough for Maduro to regain his "number" of April. In fact, if votes are reasonably counted, I am on record that chavismo will not reach 6.5 million votes, a net loss of 1 million at the very least since April, in elections that may have a surprisingly high turnout for local votes.

On the other hand the paradox maybe that the opposition vote will not only be re-energized, but as many store clerks are losing their jobs these coming weeks, the opposition may gain a not insignificant number of weak chavista votes directly!  I am willing to go on record that irregardless of the tally, the MUD will not get less than 400 K votes more than chavismo, cheating included. I can see easily chavismo getting no more than 6 million nationally and the MUD reaching the 6.5 million.  Note, I am not predicting anything yet, nor will I considering the extraordinary emotionalism of this vote and the plain intention of electoral fraud from the regime. I am just saying that this 6 to 6.5 result would seem "normal" for me under current conditions. With such a result we would all know that in fact the opposition has now 1 million votes more than chavismo and that this one can stay in office only through violent repression.

It is interesting to note that today November 23 series of street protests all across the country, more or less attended according to the locale (it was as the expected bust in San Felipe for example, but a big hit in Caracas), has been yet another opportunity for the regime to go a notch further in repression. First there has been a blackout on all TV networks in coverage of that protest and Capriles had to go to CNN tonight so at least somewhere we knew what was going on.  That was not all, the man in charge of organizing Capriles campaign travels across the country was arrested for a few hours by the state repressive security breaking into his home in the wee hours. Lopez was directly threatened with jail by Maduro. And other such incidents, including yet a new wave of mall "price police supervision" to try to lure shoppers to the mall instead of public protest. To no avail of course, but it betrays how far the regime will go by December 8.

The details

Considering the above it should be clear for the reader that monitoring individual races is as much wishful thinking than actual electoral science.  Thus in the table below I have only picked up a few races that should help the reader understand better the general political trend of the country in the last three years.  The table uses the rounded up vote numbers of chavismo and opposition in 2008, the last municipal vote, and April 2013. In pink chavista districts and in blue opposition ones. Note, sometimes the color does not match the numbers because I have added numbers when there was a division in 2008. For example in Cocorote the opposition wins by a thousand but loses the mayor anyway because it went divided. The "total" at the bottom include the votes listed minus those of Libertador included in the Caracas at large.  I have starred some districts which are "rural", for the sake of the discussion. I have calculated the percentile advantage for each election for chavismo which means that when the number is negative then the opposition leads. And to compare the two elections I calculated how that percentile moved in 4.5 years. Comments after the table.


The Caracas Metro area has steadily been gained over by the opposition. Even in Vargas, the most pro Chavez area the opposition has progressed by 9.5%. If Libertador, downtown Caracas, is not a safe bet for the opposition (though its division seems to have been overcome) we should remember that in 2010 the opposition did win by a couple of thousands of votes.  Thus Ledezma seems almost a shoo in for reelection for Caracas at large, some polls already giving him a 10% advance on Ernesto Villegas, and advance that may also help in taking Libertador.

If all the stunts to recover Caracas at large seem to have failed for chavismo the real races are elsewhere, in Miranda where the opposition will prove its growth only if it confirms that it is now a majority in Los Teques and it it takes Guatire. Thus the measure of success for the MUD here is to gain at least 2 out of Libertador, Los Teques and Guatire. It can be done, even the three of them and a bonus district in the Valles del Tuy which would be a true humiliation for chavismo.


There the opposition situation is not as favorable. There is really no great candidate at the top of any ticket, the decline of Proyecto Venezuela is not yet compensated by other groups, and the regime has played particularly dirty this time around screwing the natural candidate for Maracay, Mardo, and about to screw the one for Valencia, Cocchiola.

In Yaracuy we pay the consequences of division in 2008 which cost us ALL districts and thus no bases to rebuild. In addition the current rather vicious governor has sponsored many development for low social income in San Felipe turning this most anti Chavez district of Yaracuy iredder, while the middle class developments went to Independencia and Cocorote making them bluer. Thus the metro area of San Felipe may go MUD while San Felipe would remain chavista.

For good measure I have added three small rural districts. Except for Urachiche where the opposition was really low, its growth is not that great though real. Bejuma always lost for divisions this time around should finally go opposition. Boraure which is in part a dormitory of San Felipe could benefit from the pauperization of San Felipe which lured away some of its settlers to go this time around MUD.

The measure of opposition success in these states is to gain the three metro districts of San Felipe and Valencia. If Valencia in spite of all of chavismo treacheries is still likely MUD, a loss in San Felipe would not be compensated by a victory in Bejuma and Boraure. And taking Maracay is of course the true measure of success in that area, as it would prove that the military in this army rich district is not a monolith behind Maduro...


Barquisimeto should go MUD and maybe even Carora, in addition to Palavecimo. With this three districts chavismo would suffer a major set back. But even if Carora does not fall, taking Barquisimeto, once the jewel in Chavez crown, is going to be major psychological blow for chavismo. Then again they have only themselves to blame for having put a lousy mayor, not allowing her to run again so that a military lout is the candidate this time. The opposition MUD candidate is Ramos, not a great one, but compared to the chavista ones, after the humiliations imposed by Chavez on governor Falcon and even Barquisimeto, chavismo should not be surprised if it loses Barquisimeto by as much as 20 points.


This is one painful and unaccountable governor loss last year since even cheating was not that easy there in a state where UNT supposedly has a strong electoral machinery.  Also the mayor of Maracaibo, nepotistically set in the wife of exiled ex governor Rosales, has not been that great.  Still, the MUD can redeem itself by retaining Maracaibo and adding its southern urban district of San Francisco. Gaining these two districts is crucial for the MUD to remain viable in Zulia, regardless of what happens elsewhere in the state. It is possible considering that chavismo has launched an annoying clown for Maracaibo and that Omar Prieto in San Francisco has been one of the worst thugs of chavismo in recent years and people my be getting tired of the character.


The Andes state are in turmoil after voting for Capriles in 2012 and amazingly putting up chavista governors 2 months later... Well, not Trujillo which is one of the most chavista states today even though its main and lone city Valera may just go MUD this time around. It would be a major success.

Tachira which unaccountably went from the most anti Chavez state to elect "moderate" chavista Vielma Mora should redeem itself with a smashing MUD victory in San Cristobal its state capital.  Merida should also go MUD in its state capital and start undoing the damage of a series of unexplained lousy chavista governors by taking over the second urban district of El Vigia. Thus the measure of success in the Andes, more than how many districts the MUD gains, is to recover a solid vote plurality through Tachira and Merida and pick up Valera to dent Trujillo. Getting that is the best guarantee that the opposition has indeed a solid base for future challenges.


The reader may have noted that I have not included Falcon and now I am skipping over Cojedes and Apure, but these three states do not weigh much today in the grand scheme of things.  In the Llanos, Chavez bastion, the only possibility is to gain Barinas, the capital of the homonym state. More than anything else, getting the state capital of the state who cursed us with baby Chavez, is the best way to demonstrate that chavismo is indeed in the defensive.

I have included for good measure Acarigua and San Juan de Los Morros just to show that if there is progress for the MUD it is rather glacial for the hot weather of this region. Besides Barinas, the lone possible gain is San Juan.


These states that came late into chavismo grasp have never been that solid for it, besides Sucre the poorer one and a natural candidate for co-dependency politics. Nueva Esparta was lost in December because Morel wanted to run for the nth time and not having been such a great governor, well, he got booted.  There the race to watch is Porlamar, the main district, which should go MUD but where chavismo has dispatched one of its few stars, at least compared to other lifeless polticos.  From my last visit I am still calling it a toss up.

Sucre I am afraid is not to be recovered this time around once the Voluntad Popular representative of Cumana was blackmailed rather too easily to join chavismo.  Getting Cumana is as much as we can hope for.  Carupano would be a feat for the annals.

Anzoategui is also a land of betrayal as the El Tigre Paraquiema family left chavismo and came back to it. In spite of that, or maybe becasue of that, Capriels did rather well last April.

And in Monagas which voted for Chavez even though he forced them to drink contaminated water we have no hope except for an upset in Maturin though its dependency on PDVSA does not make me very optimistic.  The measure of resistance there is to at least retain Porlamar, pick up either Barcelona or El Tigre. Success will exist only if we add either Cumana or Maturin while getting both El Tigre and Barcelona.


The election there is particularly interesting because in the latest December Governor election there seems to be very believable claims that the election was stolen. Since then social and political peace have never returned and the chavista military governor has been shown to be at the top of an impressive corruption pyramid. It is to be noted that Puerto Ordaz, the largest worker city in Venezuela went for Capriles if barely in April while the state capital Ciudad Bolivar has been steadily opposition in recent elections.  Nowhere but Puerto Ordaz could illustrate better the break between chavismo and workers as these one are getting tired of so much corruption and broken promises.  Gaining Puerto Ordaz, if opposition divisions are smoothed over, may be with Barquisimeto and Libertador the three biggest omens of chavismo debacle to come.

Concluding notes

The real meaning of December 8, if we make it there as it is clear that the regime is seeking some form of confrontation to postpone the vote or hide massive cheating is not in how many town halls the opposition wins or loses, but which ones and how many votes.

The number of votes because if the opposition manages more than 50% by the CNE it would mean clearly, at least to the military that are the true rulers of the country, that maybe 60% of the country has abandoned chavismo or at the very least Maduro. If Maduro does not get 50% cheating included his days are numbered as his own people will start actively to seek ways to get rid of him.

Of course we would not know for a while the exact voting tally since there are a few dissidents on either side and on election night what people will see are how many town-halls each side got.  From the rural districts, as this table hints at, there is not much to hope for: the acute dependency of these people on government grants ensure that no matter how much the opposition grows, a majority of these districts will remain chavista. Thus Maduro is almost 100% assured that on December 8 at midnight to be able to claim a victory by getting a "majority" of cities, the only thing he can use to try to gloss over an almost certain defeat on vote total.

This being said on December 9 around noon we will be able to measure the real strength of the opposition or weakness of Maduro. Since the objective of the opposition is to speed up the exit of Maduro, an objective which has sympathies inside chavismo, we need a score card along these lines.

Success: more votes than chavismo;  retain Maracaibo and Caracas at large; ensure San Cristobal and 90% of districts already held;  gain at least 4 out of Valencia, Maracay, Barcelona, Puerto Ordaz, Barquisimeto, Los Teques, Cumana, San Francisco; gain maybe a couple dozen of smaller ones so that at least we get one district in every state.

Triumph: at least 52% of the votes cast with chavismo pushed down to 46%; gain 6 of the list above; gain at least 3 of Valera, Barinas, Maturin, Carora, the 3 San Felipe metro together, Libertador, Guatire.

Maduro resigning conditions: a majority of districts regardless of their size as long as  Libertador is included.

Why this scorecards? For the stakes at play. But this is for another post.


  1. Anonymous5:00 PM

    Thanks for all the effort Daniel!

  2. Something to consider is the effect that the agreement which was just reached with Iran will have on Venezuelan politics.It is likely to lower the oil prices in the near future, thus adding to Maduro's problems for next year.

    Now going back to elections, if the opposition camp were to win with 56 %,and Maduro allows them their victory( even at 51 %) he will gain the benefit of being seen as democratic to the International community.

    On the other hand , he will be seen as a loser inside of Venezuela.


    1. chavismo has long ceased to be seen a democratic by people in the know. and any effect on iran deal is months away for venezuela, too late for 8D

    2. Daniel,

      That is precisely why I said "next year"

      As for 'people in the know', I am sure you are right however many of those people' in the know' are looking for the perfect excuse not to remember that they know.


    3. Daniel, I suspect the market has factored in the Iran accord and will behave accordingly, tomorrow. Keep your eyes peeled on the price of oil, as of tomorrow, and that of the futures market.

      Wm & Max will have to wait a lot longer for positive effects to take place from their wee visit.

    4. Syd, yes, but... Venezuela will be cashing in though December and January the oil it sold in the last trimester. So the Iran effect will only be felt next year. Of course, if it were a serious regime they would already be taking prevention measures but they are not so they will wait until actually moneys stops flowing to deal with the issue.

  3. Thanks for your work on this, Daniel. May the results come close. I especially thank you for your rationales as to why it's important to vote. Hopefully, your comments will have finally counteracted the subversive negatives, or off-the-cuff-impressions-without-accompanying-arguments.

  4. Aiming and praying for Triumph.

  5. Gracias, y aqui estere en Ohio, con los dedos cruzados para que la gente vote masivamente y tus predicciones de un triunfo oppositor de mas del 50% se cumplan!

  6. kernel_panic9:25 PM

    I just read on the dollartoday site this article, you can dismiss it completely (I dont completly trust it because I don't know who the original author is) , about how he sees the situation on several parts of venezuela, according to some info from his sources:

    the article in question is:RESUCITO EL ESPÍRITU DEL 14 DE ABRIL: La Arrechera

    This what it zes

    No tengo dudas que LEDEZMA gana en este momento por una cifra grosera. VILLEGAS puede recortar y hasta ganar pero no creo que este dispuesto a pagar el precio. OCARIZ gana y EL POTRO tendrá que volver al canto. Pudiera ser contratado por OCARIZ para la celebración. Lo de WINSTON en BARUTA es peor que una caricatura.

    Realidades municipales: dos candidatos revolucionarios tienen una segura derrota Magglio (Sotillo) y María Emilia Escar(Urbaneja). Ultimátum, Buena pelea dan el Ing. Jesús Rosas y el Arq Juan Carlos Vallejo anótenlo por ahí, después no digan qué no se lo dijimos…En el Municipio Bolívar El candidato Guillermo Martínez realiza una buena campaña, al igual que Marcos Figueroa en Municipio Sotillo… Nadie se confíe.

    Nuevos estudios de la encuestadora HERCON demuestran que es irreversible el triunfo de EVELYN.En LOSSADA sigue ganando MARIO URDANETA del PSUV. En MIRANDA mejora la oposición y en especial NOLBERTO PEROZO. Buena campaña sigue realizando MARIA BOLIVAR y en La Guajira RICARDO FERNANDEZ, le pone mucho color y calor a la campaña. Gana ANDRICK OVIEDO en LA RITA. En la Cañada y en MACHIQUEZ la oposición gana 70 a 30. Absolutamente increíble. En PADILLA nada que hacer repite ILDEBRANDO RIOS “El PELUCHE” del PSUV. En SIMON BOLIVAR a mi juicio la pelea esta planteada entre FRANK CONILL Independiente y el del PSUV. GILDA VERA tendrá que retirarse por las presiones del actual Alcalde GUSTAVO TORRES que también es candidato disidente de la MUD. Mal negocio el realizado por ROGELIO BOSCAN de COPEI. OMAR PRIETO del PSUV San Francisco sigue ganando pero los últimos errores de MADURO no lo ayudan aunque su campaña mediática es de las mejores.

    1. Observe that he does not talk about ANY of the districts I mentioned but San francisco. his "previsions" are based on polls to which I have no access, or on districts that are shoo in and where thus I need not waste more time on an already long post.

      I wrote about trends in general on illustrative districts, not on predictions. The post is to help folks understand the election, not predicting the results.

      Usually at this point on an election there are many local papers that publish such sorts of articles from which dollar today may have taken it, or the inspiration. In general they are proved wrong except for the obvious districts. For example what is the point of discussing Baruta where we know that the opposition will have at least 75% votes running a yellow dog? Wisnton was sent there to try to help Villegas by getting him an extra few thousand votes. That he accepted only proves that Winston is even more of an idiot than what we thought he was. Poltical idiot that is, because we can be sure he cashed at the gate....

  7. Pichuco4:22 AM

    Daniel, since the April elections you have published many articles where you mention the fraud that elected Maduro. As a matter of fact you just posted an article a couple of days ago where you said so.

    So if the CNE cheated in April, don't you think they'll cheat again in the upcoming elections?
    Do you still plan to vote even if you know for sure that they'll cheat?

    1. There's no way anyone can say at this stage whether or not they'll cheat, but hey, it worked last time didn't it? As for voting, as Daniel says, if you don't vote, you cannot complain afterwards. It's the only "democratic right" you can exercise. Use it and think of those who still don't have it.

    2. OK, I ll bite.

      Yes the CNE is actively cheating. I am on récord saying that it may add up to 5% of the total votes cast.

      So I do not vote on December 8.

      Then what do we do?

    3. @ClaudioNazoa
      Vzla no se salvará con ciudadanos de brazos cruzados que llaman a la abstención. Abstenerse es no hacer nada, es suicida, es no querer al país

    4. Pichuco3:48 PM

      Syd a quote fit for a bumper sticker? is that all you got? what else can we expect from a guy that gets his information from "a little bird".

      Daniel, let me throw the question back to you: you vote under known fraudulent conditions, then what do YOU do?

    5. True, Pichu, a trite, bumper-sticker-like quote. But I'd rather read that than the reverse. That is, from pseudo-mystics who promote negative impressions, based on mood swings, from afar.

      I can't speak for Daniel. And given circumstances, I can't vote on 8D. But if I were to hazard a guess, or if we were talking about national elections, I'd rationalize as follows: If the CNE engages in 5% fraud (possible), if democracy is already compromised in Venezuela (definite), if abstaining enlarges the space for the rojo-rojitos (already proven), THEN, let me engage in a 95% process which may help stem the red tides.

    6. Pichuco

      What I will do if I vote is already amply described in several posts of my blog, starting with the elemental protest for election fraud. Also, I have disagreed often with the MUD on that issue.

      Now, where it is it written what we are supposed to do if we do not vote? And do not dodge the question by asking me to repeat what I have already written several times. If you are not a regular reader that does not allow you to ask me to write on demand. Do your homework.

  8. OT.. Qué tal? A viper auto-declares herself president with "irreversible results". Hello, where have I heard that before?

    Happy ending: The Castro-Madurista playbook got squashed (por ahora) by independent powers (Honduran TSE) and a free press teleSurtv.


Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the sixth day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the basic polite rules of discourse. I will be ruthless in erasing, as well as those who replied to any off rule comment.