Apparently Chavez has already launched his campaign for next year legislative elections. Mind you, they are due in MORE than one year but Chavez is already going gung-ho on the campaign trail starting with a totally unjustifiable cadena of nearly 6 hours this Sunday to inaugurate a long built heath center in Caucagua and to rant against students that mooned him at their last rally. Boy, do they know how to get on Chavez case! He is so predictable, so vain that he cannot take upon himself to ignore that event and ends up giving it maximum coverage by being a cry baby about it.
This is not a good way to start a campaign, not the way he has got people used to, the invincible leader. But I suspect that negative polls been what they are, money to buy votes not being as plentiful as in the past, the sooner he starts the better for him, he must think.
Not that things look much brighter for the opposition as usual. More than ever it is ABSOLUTELY clear that without a single list of candidates they are not going to win. As I will explain in subsequent posts, I think that it is not enough for the opposition to get 50% + 1 of the ballots. It probably will need at least 55% not only to ensure that it does get 50% + 1 at the Nazional Assembly to make it National again, but also that high a vote to force Chavez to acknowledge the victory. That is, anything less than a 10% margin of victory will allow chavismo to do all sorts of maneuvers to erase it. Today they are desperate enough that outright frontal cheating is a clear possibility and only by making that one too big to hide properly can we force them to relinquish control of the Nazional Assembly and perhaps start the road to the end of the regime in a peaceful way.
For this the opposition needs a clear message, a way to select its candidates in a unitary way that not only keeps sympathizers motivated but also avoid devastating internal struggles which will make an eventual "unity" a work of fiction, and of course more than ever a TOTAL presence at the polling stations to record the fraud that this time is all but a sure thing. Unfortunately so far it does not look like it is happening for reasons that I fail to comprehend except if I look inside the vanity of some of the opposition leaders, in particular blank shooting of Borges, bitter Rosales, sillily ambitious Leopoldo and mummy like Allup. It is not too late yet but if by December 31 the opposition has not put together a basic message and a mechanism of candidate selection, we can all go home and forget about it.
There are two national elections next year, the Nazional Assembly by December and normally at least 3 months earlier the town councils elections. Plus some local essential ones of which Maracaibo mayor is at the top. I bet you Maracaibo mayor is first and that Chavez will gamble it all on that one. The candidate is irrelevant for chavismo, Chavez will be there every week end.
Depending on the Maracaibo result then Chavez will decide whether separate the other two elections and by how many weeks. If he wins Maracaibo he will try to put both council and Assembly together as early as October on any excuse. If he loses it, he will probably go through the council ones ASAP to take his losses there (August? when the opposition is on vacation) and put all of his money and time in a blitzkrieg two months campaign in October-November to at least ensure a thin majority at the Assembly in a December vote: it might not be a rubber stamp anymore but it will be unable to control anything. Chavez will just have to weather it until 2012 when he can do something about it again after he gets reelected, maybe.
In a way chavismo does not have it so easy either. If it counts on Chavez, a formidable campaigner even if showing some wear, the PSUV is still not a very good electoral machine on its own without Chavez direct fuel input. In addition next February Chavez will reach 11 years in office and well, 11 years is a lot even for successful government. Ask Thatcher about it... To this you can add that crime, ineptitude, corruption and inflation are not going to go down in any noticeable way, more likely getting worse. Still, the power of the purse and a tireless campaigner who still command irrational affection are still two powerful weapons. Unless the opposition puts its act together.
Thus in the next couple of weeks I will need to write about:
- what kind of political message the opposition can cobble up (it is amazingly simpler than what you think which baffles me that they still are discussing it!)
- how the electoral system is stacked against the opposition thus requiring extreme vigilance, dedication and organization to counter it (the final answer it to have witnesses and support at EVERY polling station, no excuses)
- how the opposition should select its candidates (note: I am not for an all out primary, it would be a disaster though it is a must that at least half of the candidates are selected through some form of primary, but this can only be understood once you understand the fine print of the modified electoral system).
- but no predictions, at least not a single one until June 2010 regardless of what polls might say.
-The end-
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Monday, October 05, 2009
Forero on Venezuelan political dissenting
At the Washington Post they do not mince words as to how Chavez deals with his political and democratic opposition. Maybe we should include this article and the one from Maria Anastasia O'Grady in the WSJ, see preceding post, for mail to Senator's Kerry office, apparently in dire need of an enlightenment he seems to have lost since his failed run 5 years ago.
-The end-
-The end-
Sunday, October 04, 2009
A surreal holiday
It was indeed a surreal holiday, to be reminded in full all what an organized society can achieve in general happiness for its people; and the return was even more surreal as I was welcomed by a giant poster of Chavez with some silly slogan while I was waiting in turn for my immigration check. Brutally I was reminded that I was back in a country on the edge of 4th-world-ization.
I came back suffering from a bad cold, made the worse by hours and hours of AC in planes and airports. And yet I cannot blame the cold for the impression of delirium I got as I was trying to catch up with the news. In a way it is good, I can resume in this single post two full weeks of events because all that matters is the symbolism of a regime that has no idea on how to regain its popularity and stay in office, a regime reduced to threats as the way to hang on.
Let's start with Luisa Ortega asking the Interpol to arrest Carlos Andres Perez, CAP, ex president of Venezuela, the one against whom Chavez made his failed coup. I have already described to you this sorry personage, the one in charge, we are told, to prosecute crime in Venezuela and who is miserably failing at it as crime keeps getting redder numbers while the jail system keep getting worse as the courts are everyday less efficient. In other words she is one of the responsible folks as to why I can sleep soundly in Seattle in a basement with my window open and I need a triple set of iron doors and a dog to do the same thing in San Felipe.
Luisa Ortega should be way too busy with the current disastrous situation to get personally invested in looking for events that happened two decades ago. Amen of not looking into the chavista share of crimes of 2002. Why is the woman after ten, 10, years of chavismo deciding to arrest a senile and near death ex-president, an arrest that this late in time will not solve any of the mysteries of those days?
But Luisa Ortega is acting on orders of Chavez, to try to distract opinion from the current crime disaster, trying to have people forget that in a few moths Chavez will have been 11 years in office and that none of the 1998 problems have been solved, at least not in a long term fashion. And she abides willingly with all sorts of actions for which one day she shall be punished because when everything is said and done she is the ultimate "resentido social", unable to see beyond her own personal condition. She is the wall flower of past decades who now thinks she is the Carrie of the XXI century socialism ball macabre.
Another bit of news is that now the government will decide up to three hours of programing in independent TV and radio networks. Apparently lengthy cadenas are not enough, forced free advertising is not enough, now Chavez wants to decide what people should see. The government, according to the circulating proposal, will decide from the shows and stuff "independent producers" produce and force TV and radio to pass them, at the time the government decides to present them. I am not sure if it will be 3 hours weekly or daily but in a way it is totally irrelevant: right now there is not enough material produced to even cover the needs of TVes, the network that was robbed from private hands in 2007 by Chavez. How can they expect to fill the grids of Globovision, Venevision and Televen when they cannot fill up Tves, and can only come up with political garbage for VTV, Vive and ANTV?
To add insult to injury the woman in charge to organize and decide the application is Blanca Eekhout, a woman who since Chavez picked her up from obscurity has not demonstrated once any taste or intelligence for the TV programming she has been in charge of. In other words what this means is that the government genuinely thinks that its message is not reaching all, in addition of course of thinking that any criticism of its actions is just a bunch of lies that need to be countered. A creepy fundamentalist should solve that issue.
The thing here is that after ten years there are those within Chavez regime that still think that after 10 and soon 11 terrible years if people like me still do not support Chavez it is because we just have not received 'the word'. How retrograde and fundamentalist can one get? I have met relentless born again Christians that have considerable broader spirit and tolerance than the Eekhout(s) of this world.
To give you a sense of perspective, if that proposal were to be applied in full, Globovision would pass an average of 6 hours of prime time a day of pro Chavez propaganda. That is when we take in and average the cadenas, the forced advertising for free and the new programs to be imposed we shoudl come up with that number at the very least.
And yet it gets better as the government is again trying to find a way to force pay for TV to transmit Chavez cadenas. Yes, that is right, according to chavismo BBC or National Geographic should allow confiscation of their broadcast lines, for which I pay for anyway, so as to pass Chavez cadenas.
You know something, I cannot think of a more unwilling surreal admission from the part of chavismo that its message has failed. They are simply unable to comprehend that I might prefer to watch Discovery's Animal Planet rather than the animalistic rants of Chavez.
-The end-
I came back suffering from a bad cold, made the worse by hours and hours of AC in planes and airports. And yet I cannot blame the cold for the impression of delirium I got as I was trying to catch up with the news. In a way it is good, I can resume in this single post two full weeks of events because all that matters is the symbolism of a regime that has no idea on how to regain its popularity and stay in office, a regime reduced to threats as the way to hang on.
Let's start with Luisa Ortega asking the Interpol to arrest Carlos Andres Perez, CAP, ex president of Venezuela, the one against whom Chavez made his failed coup. I have already described to you this sorry personage, the one in charge, we are told, to prosecute crime in Venezuela and who is miserably failing at it as crime keeps getting redder numbers while the jail system keep getting worse as the courts are everyday less efficient. In other words she is one of the responsible folks as to why I can sleep soundly in Seattle in a basement with my window open and I need a triple set of iron doors and a dog to do the same thing in San Felipe.
Luisa Ortega should be way too busy with the current disastrous situation to get personally invested in looking for events that happened two decades ago. Amen of not looking into the chavista share of crimes of 2002. Why is the woman after ten, 10, years of chavismo deciding to arrest a senile and near death ex-president, an arrest that this late in time will not solve any of the mysteries of those days?
But Luisa Ortega is acting on orders of Chavez, to try to distract opinion from the current crime disaster, trying to have people forget that in a few moths Chavez will have been 11 years in office and that none of the 1998 problems have been solved, at least not in a long term fashion. And she abides willingly with all sorts of actions for which one day she shall be punished because when everything is said and done she is the ultimate "resentido social", unable to see beyond her own personal condition. She is the wall flower of past decades who now thinks she is the Carrie of the XXI century socialism ball macabre.
Another bit of news is that now the government will decide up to three hours of programing in independent TV and radio networks. Apparently lengthy cadenas are not enough, forced free advertising is not enough, now Chavez wants to decide what people should see. The government, according to the circulating proposal, will decide from the shows and stuff "independent producers" produce and force TV and radio to pass them, at the time the government decides to present them. I am not sure if it will be 3 hours weekly or daily but in a way it is totally irrelevant: right now there is not enough material produced to even cover the needs of TVes, the network that was robbed from private hands in 2007 by Chavez. How can they expect to fill the grids of Globovision, Venevision and Televen when they cannot fill up Tves, and can only come up with political garbage for VTV, Vive and ANTV?
To add insult to injury the woman in charge to organize and decide the application is Blanca Eekhout, a woman who since Chavez picked her up from obscurity has not demonstrated once any taste or intelligence for the TV programming she has been in charge of. In other words what this means is that the government genuinely thinks that its message is not reaching all, in addition of course of thinking that any criticism of its actions is just a bunch of lies that need to be countered. A creepy fundamentalist should solve that issue.
The thing here is that after ten years there are those within Chavez regime that still think that after 10 and soon 11 terrible years if people like me still do not support Chavez it is because we just have not received 'the word'. How retrograde and fundamentalist can one get? I have met relentless born again Christians that have considerable broader spirit and tolerance than the Eekhout(s) of this world.
To give you a sense of perspective, if that proposal were to be applied in full, Globovision would pass an average of 6 hours of prime time a day of pro Chavez propaganda. That is when we take in and average the cadenas, the forced advertising for free and the new programs to be imposed we shoudl come up with that number at the very least.
And yet it gets better as the government is again trying to find a way to force pay for TV to transmit Chavez cadenas. Yes, that is right, according to chavismo BBC or National Geographic should allow confiscation of their broadcast lines, for which I pay for anyway, so as to pass Chavez cadenas.
You know something, I cannot think of a more unwilling surreal admission from the part of chavismo that its message has failed. They are simply unable to comprehend that I might prefer to watch Discovery's Animal Planet rather than the animalistic rants of Chavez.
-The end-
Saturday, October 03, 2009
Dear President Obama, about your Olympic fiasco
I am very sorry that you lost your bid for the Chicago 2016 Olympics. You might have even still been president and what greater satisfaction but to open the Olympics in your chosen home. Not that I was for Chicago, I rooted for Madrid even though I knew they had no chances: they were taken for a ride just as Paris was taken for a ride when the Olympics were given to Beijing. Paris was deprived of its reward 4 years later, the promised reward for having allowed itself to be insultingly compared to Beijing. And thus, just like Madrid, you were taken for a ride as the IOC had decided long ago that Rio would get the games. Even the final score is suspicious: with such a high margin why Rio did not win outright earlier? It suddenly picked at least 16 Asian votes?
See, you are still new at this game so I am allowing myself to let you know how you can make this abject lesson work for you in the end.
First, let me tell you that the IOC is a scumbag organization, who, in the name of a sport fairness that they supposedly represent, are in fact consummate political manipulators to perpetuate the temporary glory of rather poor second tier figuration unable to look important if it were not for their ability to manipulate the Committee. Just look at the smug face of Jacques Rogge announcing the nomination of Rio. I mean, the guy with the Tibetan blood on his hands, the guy who as soon as Beijing was over forgot any self assumed duty about freedom in China, is still directing a committee that he should have resigned from in disgrace as a liar and weak minded creep. If the committee had any moral quality they would have asked for his dismissal, by the way. Instead he got and loved every second of a US president come to beg.
You can see it by yourself. Although unfairly you will pay politically for your misplaced attempt at supporting Chicago, do not take it personally, most IOC members are morally well below you. It does not matter that you are representing one of the best traits of America, they would screw you anyway. In fact, that you are the first African American president of the US probably played a lot against you as they resent you making the US a more difficult thing to mock.
And thus I come to my point: it does not pay to be nice, it does not pay to play by the rules of a game whose rules you have no regard into, it does not matter that you try to prove that America is nice now that you are president, it does not matter that you try to be loved, you will not succeed because the world is ruled in majority by people who hate what the US represents, when they do not hate the US itself. I know what I am talking about, I have the misfortune to be a subject of infinitely embarrassing president Chavez.
As far as I am concerned, the cruel lesson you got today will be a small price for you to see the light. It is not the first time that this seems to be happening to you in spite of all your genuine best intentions. For example, you shook hands with Chavez, and even accepted a silly book from him. What good has this brought to you? Do you realize now that Chavez was only trying to gain time until he could find a way to insult you that would sound credible at least with the fascist garbage that supports him, at home and even in the US?
Or more recently, that you met with Iran in Geneva is actually playing against you since it gives a slightly less pariah status to Iran. Though in this case admittedly I cannot see what else you could have done since there is a need to know more about what is really going on inside Iran first.
I think it was worth to try to be mister Nice Guy for a few months. But it is not working outside of the scarce few sensible countries in the world, namely some in Europe and half a dozen at best around the Pacific. Politicians in Latin America, to take a sample, still think they cannot win an election if they do not show themselves to be at the very least doubtful about the US. Or why else do you think Lula allowed for Zelaya to go back into Tegucigalpa and use Brazil's embassy as his Speaker's Corner? He never liked what Hillary and Arias tried to sensibly put together! In the end he could not resist a quick sabotage.
Let me put it in a different wording: just like all those democrats loved to have Fidel visit them, they will love to have their picture taken with you just to trash the US again once they are far enough from you. We are a fluff subcontinent that values democracy only as it helps a given leader or group. There was a general amazement when Nixon was forced to resign, it was never really taken as a sign of USA democratic vigor.
Of course I am not advocating a return to the arrogance of your predecessor: we are ALL paying the price for it today, the more so Venezuelans who only got an autocratic Chavez courtesy of oil prices the Iraq war sent up.
But there must be somewhere in the middle where you could try to carve a good role for yourself, perhaps leaving you a nice place in history. One suggestion is to pick a few values of democracy and human rights and stand by them, choosing your friends accordingly. And helping only your Friends. Those who think that Chavez or Ahmadinejad or even Lula can help them better, can stick with them.
What would that mean for Latin America, for example? Cut off all the pro Chavez countries, stop buying oil from Venezuela, pass an FTA with Colombia ASAP and create a prosperity zone with Peru, Chile, Colombia and whomever wants in Central America. Do not worry about Brazil, you are too much of a market for them: when they realize you are serious they will come around of their own, they are not stupid. Forget about ALBA and Argentina, let them sink in their idiocy, it is the only way we will learn our lesson.
Heck, you could start today, by dumping Zelaya once and for all, he is bad news. Dump Zelaya and demand that Micheletti resigns for a new interim government to organize elections. I bet you can gain that: Honduras seems willing to accept anything as long as Zelaya does not come back. All appearances would be covered! At this point the only countries that would criticise you are those that would criticize you no matter what you do. Why bother with them anymore? After the IOC humiliation do you want the OAS to do you in?
Meanwhile forget about IOC and other garbage, you are too good for them, do not waste anymore of your time with them: THEY WILL NEVER OBLIGE YOU.
PS: I know Chicago and it was my second pick. After all it has less pollution, less crime and less corruption than Rio, and no exposed favellas by the way. In South America there are at least 2 cities just in Brazil more suitable than Rio, Curitiba and Porto Alegre, cities who need way more the name recognition that Rio does not need. Rio is as political a designation as Beijing was, though less condemnable, no Tibet or Internet censorship at least. Madrid had the best dossier and cheapest one, Rio the worst.
-The end-
See, you are still new at this game so I am allowing myself to let you know how you can make this abject lesson work for you in the end.
First, let me tell you that the IOC is a scumbag organization, who, in the name of a sport fairness that they supposedly represent, are in fact consummate political manipulators to perpetuate the temporary glory of rather poor second tier figuration unable to look important if it were not for their ability to manipulate the Committee. Just look at the smug face of Jacques Rogge announcing the nomination of Rio. I mean, the guy with the Tibetan blood on his hands, the guy who as soon as Beijing was over forgot any self assumed duty about freedom in China, is still directing a committee that he should have resigned from in disgrace as a liar and weak minded creep. If the committee had any moral quality they would have asked for his dismissal, by the way. Instead he got and loved every second of a US president come to beg.
You can see it by yourself. Although unfairly you will pay politically for your misplaced attempt at supporting Chicago, do not take it personally, most IOC members are morally well below you. It does not matter that you are representing one of the best traits of America, they would screw you anyway. In fact, that you are the first African American president of the US probably played a lot against you as they resent you making the US a more difficult thing to mock.
And thus I come to my point: it does not pay to be nice, it does not pay to play by the rules of a game whose rules you have no regard into, it does not matter that you try to prove that America is nice now that you are president, it does not matter that you try to be loved, you will not succeed because the world is ruled in majority by people who hate what the US represents, when they do not hate the US itself. I know what I am talking about, I have the misfortune to be a subject of infinitely embarrassing president Chavez.
As far as I am concerned, the cruel lesson you got today will be a small price for you to see the light. It is not the first time that this seems to be happening to you in spite of all your genuine best intentions. For example, you shook hands with Chavez, and even accepted a silly book from him. What good has this brought to you? Do you realize now that Chavez was only trying to gain time until he could find a way to insult you that would sound credible at least with the fascist garbage that supports him, at home and even in the US?
Or more recently, that you met with Iran in Geneva is actually playing against you since it gives a slightly less pariah status to Iran. Though in this case admittedly I cannot see what else you could have done since there is a need to know more about what is really going on inside Iran first.
I think it was worth to try to be mister Nice Guy for a few months. But it is not working outside of the scarce few sensible countries in the world, namely some in Europe and half a dozen at best around the Pacific. Politicians in Latin America, to take a sample, still think they cannot win an election if they do not show themselves to be at the very least doubtful about the US. Or why else do you think Lula allowed for Zelaya to go back into Tegucigalpa and use Brazil's embassy as his Speaker's Corner? He never liked what Hillary and Arias tried to sensibly put together! In the end he could not resist a quick sabotage.
Let me put it in a different wording: just like all those democrats loved to have Fidel visit them, they will love to have their picture taken with you just to trash the US again once they are far enough from you. We are a fluff subcontinent that values democracy only as it helps a given leader or group. There was a general amazement when Nixon was forced to resign, it was never really taken as a sign of USA democratic vigor.
Of course I am not advocating a return to the arrogance of your predecessor: we are ALL paying the price for it today, the more so Venezuelans who only got an autocratic Chavez courtesy of oil prices the Iraq war sent up.
But there must be somewhere in the middle where you could try to carve a good role for yourself, perhaps leaving you a nice place in history. One suggestion is to pick a few values of democracy and human rights and stand by them, choosing your friends accordingly. And helping only your Friends. Those who think that Chavez or Ahmadinejad or even Lula can help them better, can stick with them.
What would that mean for Latin America, for example? Cut off all the pro Chavez countries, stop buying oil from Venezuela, pass an FTA with Colombia ASAP and create a prosperity zone with Peru, Chile, Colombia and whomever wants in Central America. Do not worry about Brazil, you are too much of a market for them: when they realize you are serious they will come around of their own, they are not stupid. Forget about ALBA and Argentina, let them sink in their idiocy, it is the only way we will learn our lesson.
Heck, you could start today, by dumping Zelaya once and for all, he is bad news. Dump Zelaya and demand that Micheletti resigns for a new interim government to organize elections. I bet you can gain that: Honduras seems willing to accept anything as long as Zelaya does not come back. All appearances would be covered! At this point the only countries that would criticise you are those that would criticize you no matter what you do. Why bother with them anymore? After the IOC humiliation do you want the OAS to do you in?
Meanwhile forget about IOC and other garbage, you are too good for them, do not waste anymore of your time with them: THEY WILL NEVER OBLIGE YOU.
PS: I know Chicago and it was my second pick. After all it has less pollution, less crime and less corruption than Rio, and no exposed favellas by the way. In South America there are at least 2 cities just in Brazil more suitable than Rio, Curitiba and Porto Alegre, cities who need way more the name recognition that Rio does not need. Rio is as political a designation as Beijing was, though less condemnable, no Tibet or Internet censorship at least. Madrid had the best dossier and cheapest one, Rio the worst.
-The end-
Friday, October 02, 2009
An easy one to resume blogging life
So the government "celebrates" tonight that they won the elections for the oil industry trade union. They got a whopping 54%!
Huh?!?!
Before I left we were still wondering whether those elections would be held, while we we were watching to extraordinary effort made by the government to put all electoral advantages on its side. And yet the "opposition" list, opposition being a very relative term here, still managed 27% while dissident and disgruntled chavista seem to account for the rest.
Can some one make a rational explanation that for an industry that was purged of all of its anti chavista elements in 2003, that had a strict "rojo-rojito" hiring policy since, that fires happily whomever they dislike at will, that used anything in the book to cheat and put pressure on the workers to vote for the boss today, still manage only 54%?
Whatever, it really does not matter whether the victory is a true or fake or a Pyrrhic 54%. What matters is that for the first time in Venezuelan history the oil workers voted for the boss men. And so went there the essential worker rights to get a trade union that represents them. I am sure that those who voted for "plancha 7" will be delighted, perhaps even in the short term as the new labor convention will be negotiated with a boss that is everyday looking more and more for money. Luckily for them "plancha 1" got enough representatives in the new bureau that it will be able to be the watch dog without baring any of the blame for any caving in of the workers to the interest of the state. Lovely....
As for Chavez, if he thinks his problems are through with such a result, I have news for him..........
-The end-
Huh?!?!
Before I left we were still wondering whether those elections would be held, while we we were watching to extraordinary effort made by the government to put all electoral advantages on its side. And yet the "opposition" list, opposition being a very relative term here, still managed 27% while dissident and disgruntled chavista seem to account for the rest.
Can some one make a rational explanation that for an industry that was purged of all of its anti chavista elements in 2003, that had a strict "rojo-rojito" hiring policy since, that fires happily whomever they dislike at will, that used anything in the book to cheat and put pressure on the workers to vote for the boss today, still manage only 54%?
Whatever, it really does not matter whether the victory is a true or fake or a Pyrrhic 54%. What matters is that for the first time in Venezuelan history the oil workers voted for the boss men. And so went there the essential worker rights to get a trade union that represents them. I am sure that those who voted for "plancha 7" will be delighted, perhaps even in the short term as the new labor convention will be negotiated with a boss that is everyday looking more and more for money. Luckily for them "plancha 1" got enough representatives in the new bureau that it will be able to be the watch dog without baring any of the blame for any caving in of the workers to the interest of the state. Lovely....
As for Chavez, if he thinks his problems are through with such a result, I have news for him..........
-The end-
Thursday, October 01, 2009
Mystery location III
Before I get to face the harsh Venezuelan reality again, 
a fraudulent OAS, Chavez giving Bolivar's sword to Qaddafi, hunger strikes of students and the ridicule of the general prosecutor serving an Interpol arrest order for Carlos Andres Perez, almost death after severe strokes, here is an easy one for you. Although technically I was not residing at the place of that picture, the friend I visited this week end works there.
To spice up this, it is not enough to mention the place, you must also name the monument :)
-The end-
a fraudulent OAS, Chavez giving Bolivar's sword to Qaddafi, hunger strikes of students and the ridicule of the general prosecutor serving an Interpol arrest order for Carlos Andres Perez, almost death after severe strokes, here is an easy one for you. Although technically I was not residing at the place of that picture, the friend I visited this week end works there.To spice up this, it is not enough to mention the place, you must also name the monument :)
-The end-
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)