Friday, September 24, 2010

How the opposition won/lost on Sunday 26

Courtesy of another long time reader who appreciated that I published my negative thoughts before the vote, even if risking to discourage a few people, I got inspired to write up already the post-mortem of the opposition.

How the opposition won the 26-S vote
In spite of all that is said the fact of the matter is that Chavez lost the election more than the opposition won.  True, the opposition improved a lot in its organization and strategies but yet its machinery would have been no match if the chavista machinery had been in full motion.

The opposition managed grudgingly to unify its candidates slate.  Huffing and puffing, eventually in every single district there was a single list from the opposition.  The opposition could have run a few more primaries but the fact of the matter is that its primaries were few but democratic whereas the PSUV ones could not hide the fact that the top spots were in the end decided by Chavez anyway.

If all the voting station were not monitored this time around the polling centers monitored sample was wide enough, that cheating became very difficult for chavismo.  A very few rare centers dared to post a zero total votes for the opposition because they knew that next door voting station did have witnesses.

The campaign was not that great but at lest the people were able to sense the hard won unity.  People also were sensible to the reality of the country and chavista campaign to preserve its 2/3 majority in the assembly was not convincing as folks sensed that the opposition would not be able to stop misiones programs if Chavez wanted to keep running them.  The opposition did not offer a populist agenda but a managerial one and people did get the message.

But in the end when exit polls were examined what really mattered, what really made the difference in the the opposition success at blocking Chavez hegemony was that his campaign was too personal, that people did not buy Chavez self proclaimed legislative plebiscite, and that people got tired of lack of water, lack of electricity, lacks of jobs, lack of food on the shelves, etc...  The majority of those who switched their votes to the opposition did so to send a warning to Chavez, not a final break up notice.

Why the opposition lost the 26-S vote

It all started to go bad when the opposition did not manage to hold at least one primary in one district in each state.  People never understood why there was so many primaries in Carabobo or Portuguesa and none in Miranda or Bolivar.  Still, opposition supporters overcame that why potential "NiNi" (whatever that means) did not fail to notice that the PSUV had hosted primaries everywhere, flawed maybe but primaries nevertheless.

In spite of all promises by the opposition, it failed to man all polling stations and in at least three districts this could have made a difference.  But more than that exit polls showed that too many people decided to vote for the opposition at the last minute, fearing that their vote would not be counted, would not be defended.  This suggest that too many decided to stay home once again!

To confirm that, exit polls also revealed that the opposition message had not be convincing, that too many people did not trust the ability of the opposition as whole to stand up for Chavez and that this had weighed a lot in their eventual decision to go to vote.  Pollsters conformed that in the last days of the campaign, that the opposition was not targeting its message as it should be targeted, that the MUD pretty much ignored pollsters all along the campaign.

As a consequence of that the MUD was surprisingly unprepared when Chavez turned the election as yet another plebiscite on his persona and amazingly once again it worked.  People were willing to forgive all of Chavez recent failures in the hope that this time around he will come up and fulfill his promises.  Daniel Duquenal in his world famous blog noted that the opposition still does not understand that it needs to run at least once a negative campaign of blaming Chavez for all, knowing it would lose that vote.  However by losing that vote it would force  the chavista voter to take its own responsibility, associating it in the inevitable economic failure of the regime.  And then, finally, the opposition will be proven right, will become credible and will win by landslide.  Unfortunately the opposition prefers to settle for whatever scraps they can pry away from Chavez.

Thus, once again, in spite of all of his mistakes, Chavez was right in knowing that his political adversaries would make more mistakes than he would.

-------------------------

That way I do not have to write a post mortem on Sunday night late.  All bases covered.....

3 comments:

  1. "...the opposition still does not understand that it needs to run at least once a negative campaign of blaming Chavez for all, knowing it would lose that vote. However by losing that vote it would force the chavista voter to take its own responsibility, associating it in the inevitable economic failure of the regime."

    Daniel, you nailed it right there.

    Next time, it's time to take the gloves off. Chavez's supporters are no longer bystanders, they're accomplices in what's happening in our country. No more naivete, not more complacency. Time to point the finger at them, because they have not longer the excuse to pretend they have nothing to do with this. Not anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1979 Boat People2:59 PM

    Oh really!

    "
    Venezuela Election ‘Impossible to Manipulate,’ Smartmatic Says
    "

    http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-24/venezuela-election-impossible-to-manipulate-smartmatic-says.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1979 Boat People3:23 PM

    Come on, guy! Someone must knock on Thugo head this time.

    "
    Chavez wishes Lukashenka good luck: “Come on, guy!”
    "
    http://www.charter97.org/en/news/2010/9/24/32418/

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers