Sunday, April 17, 2011

Who will win the 2012 primaries (in Venezuela, not the US of A)

Since the date has been set, since there is nothing that we can do about, since all the ranting is done, since all the advice to the MUD has been offered graciously, there is nothing left but start preparing for that momentous day, assuming that we will make it there with a purpose.

This first ever real total primary in Venezuelan history will also be bewilderingly complex, at least for an outsider point of view.  So this very first post is going to try, with graphs, to enlighten the non Venezuelan reader (and refresh the neurons of the Venezuelan ones).  The first thing to know is that the primary is not going to be that complex after all: if there is a multitude of possible candidates now, by the end of 2011, as I hope to show below, there will be at most 6 viable presidential candidates, and by late January 2012 it is to be hoped that that number will have shrunk to 3-4 maximum, giving us hope that the winner will cross, without discussion, the 50% result.  The best way to understand what I mean is to look at Venezuelan political history since 1950.


Let's start with an explanation on how to read these slides.  I have not tried to give an accurate interpretation of right or left.  This is because, as I have explained elsewhere, in Venezuela there is a political "tradition" that we are all on the left, all preferring the common good, at the expense of the individual if necessary.  That this was "the talk" but that in practice the result was quite different is another topic of discussion.  Also, some political parties have shifted so much between "right" and "left" that their classification is basically nonsense, reflecting the crass opportunism that has ruled Venezuelan politics, in particular since the 90ies.  I must say that I did not include all the parties that have had any significance in Venezuelan history, limiting myself to mention those that I think were mentioned at some point in this blog.  You thus must read these slides from top to bottom, reflecting the evolution of political parties, their influence, their by products, etc...  avoiding to impinge absolute accuracy from these slides: I am just trying to give you an Ariadne thread to find your way through the coming months.

Finally, it will help you to open each slide in an individual window or frame as you read this text, if you are still reading this far.  And do not forget that all of these interpretations below are mine only, are certainly questionable by many historians, etc, etc...  no need to start a useless debate unless you can prove me wrong, glaringly, which I will in fact accept gladly as in history I am always willing to learn new stuff.

The first slide, circa 1950, reflects how it all started in Venezuelan modern politics.  The Gomez years of stability had effectively made irrelevant the XIX century political divisions, if we can define individual ambitions as political in the way we understand that word today.  Gomez was in fact a "Liberal" if we go by that...  Through the first half of the XX century diverse foreign influences came to develop new ways of thinking, while at the same time an indigenous intellectual movement of students under Gomez gave rise to the first true political party of Venezuela, Accion Democratica, clearly positioned to the left of the center left of those days.  URD, which was also born from that student movement was in a way more the heir of Venezuelan past movements, in particular those who opposed Gomez and his successors but could not stomach AD.  Even though in some aspects URD could sound further to the left than AD.  Finally COPEI and the Communist Party were more a product of foreign ideologies than native stock.

The 1945 forced arrival of AD to power changed irremediably the old Venezuelan political culture.  URD put a fight against AD, COPEI also tried but URD would fade with time while COPEI would eventually succeed and reach power twice by looking more and more like AD.

But the price was high.  The need of all being to the left, with "el pueblo", of all imitating AD vices more than virtues (which disappeared fast anyway) created a political vacuum on the right.  Since politics like nature abhor a vacuum, AD and COPEI were understood with time as being on the right and in the case of AD this had drastic consequences as the left of the party kept splintering in droves to create more genuine leftist movements, the most important one having been the MEP who at some point was thought to be able to defeat AD.

The Communist party also did its share of errors by remaining Stalinist for too long and thus giving rise to a democratic left with the MAS.  Causa R, and its descendant PPT, were more of a trade union origin and as such rose as much from the left as from AD labour base.

The historical failure of COPEI was its refusal to assume itself as a liberal right, because Rafael Caldera could not wait 5 more years to 1973 to become president, and because of the humiliating defeat of Uslar Pietri in 1963 who run clearly to the right of AD.  But that did not stop COPEI from its own divisions, a more leftist version with Convergencia and a more technocratic one with Proyecto Venezuela.  I must stress that as it is often the case in Venezuela a "division" might not look as such since the new parties are often created from defectors of a given party with outside personalities joining in. e.g. if the bulk of the Convergencia and PVzl voters come from COPEI but we cannot properly say that they are mainly COPEI clones.

This evolution and permanent questioning eventually lead us to 1998 where all major parties were greatly diminished and where the newer ones did not manage to impose themselves as a new better alternative.  It was this atomization, coupled with years of mediocre economic performance,  that created a political opportunity for Chavez.  If there was the formation of a new vehicle with the MVR, the parties that had the experience to manage the Chavez 1998 campaign were the old guard that rallied to him, namely the PCV, the MAS and the PPT.  Soon the authoritarian nature of the new regime was going to expel its right wing component, break down original allies forcing them to either join the new PSUV or leave the Chavez coalition which became a single party system, the PSUV where tiny movements still try to gravitate around (the PCV itself having become a tiny gnat).

The anti Chavez coalition of 1998 tried first to run as three blocks but they united in a very damaging fashion around the candidate of PVzl to lose the vote in the end (hence the brackets in the slide).  This catastrophic image damage was never repaired, and it cost PVzl its chance at becoming a novel leadership party while forcing promising politicians within the anti Chavez group to create new political parties not associated with the 1998 debacle.

The very discredited AD gave rise to a strong regional party, UNT, in Zulia.  ABP was more of a Caracas centered division of AD.  Some young COPEI activists joined with other more market oriented thinkers to create Primero Justicia which at first was also a Caracas based party but which is finally showing some signs of base expansion.  It would be for PJ to become the right wing democratic expression of Venezuela that the system so badly needs, that is if we describe 'right' in today terms, offering more stringent economic accounting and protecting individual rights against the abuses of majority rule.  I do not see that happening yet but it might be also due to the ferocious political discourse of chavismo that does not allow for such subtleties.

Still, the commie talk of chavismo is forcing all in its opposition to have a more liberal language, to recognize that the individual cannot be repressed for the sake of the community as chavismo wants, and needs, us to believe.  The time will come, courtesy of the abuses of Chavez and his followers where we will finally have all sorts of real political options in Venezuela.  That does not mean that a cliche right wing will emerge in Venezuela; after all, right and left are always adjectives modified through local adverbs.  For example, Marine Le Pen in France can be seen as a sweet ingenue when compared to Sarah Palin or la Bachman in the US....  And Obama gets along better with Sarkozy and Merkel than Bush did.

The political readjustment taking place

Perhaps the very real reason while so many political parties did not want primaries this year is that they are not ready.  No matter how reluctant they all are to abide to the historic moment, the process of redrawing the political map of Venezuela is actually just starting now.  I suppose that in a way it is justified to postpone the election, if, and only IF these guys finally put their act together.  We could even go as far as saying that PJ went along in the end because if it is true that all polls gave PJ as the winner of a primary held today, they would not get now the 50%, and probably not win a second round that would risk very much to become an all against PJ, seen as too powerful within the opposition.  I am pretty sure that AD today would risk breaking up the MUD if PJ were to win: AD thinks only about AD interests.

The social democrat option

But AD also is becoming aware that they have no viable candidate and that their only option to obtain some parcel of power is through a coalition.  Their only option is to reconcile with those that were forced out of AD, namely UNT and ABP in a so called "social democratic" alliance that even the MAS could join.  I suppose that indeed such a movement is as "social democratic" as we could get in Venezuela though I suspect it still too tied to a populist past to guarantee us the modernity that we so desperately need.  If such regrouping were to take place, there will be at least two to three months of ferocious negotiations, even some sort of primary to decide which of its possible candidates (4 so far) will get the nod of that alliance for the 2012 primary.  The only one that has a chance to get a decent score in February on its own is UNT so I suspect that eventually AD and ABP's Ledezma will in the end bow to UNT.  Which explains why Ledezma is right now in campaign to see if some polling miracle happens.  I doubt it very much though if AD decided to throw its weight behind Ledezma, polls could even up between UNT and AD/ABP.......

The apparition of a democratic left

A more interesting movement with maybe better chances to reach a common candidate for 2012 is the democratic left of Venezuela.  I have thrown together in that pinkish circle all of the disappointed of chavismo (Podemos, PPT, MAS) and those who never bought it (Causa R).  Anyone of them alone would not register much more than a 5% in 2012 but together their summation could attract enough chavismo voting (the primary will be open) that they could pass the 20% mark or at least deny an outright majority to the winner.  Maybe even win, but I doubt it, the pendulum is swinging right in Venezuela.

I think that the game is different for these people.  First, they have a viable candidate with Lara's governor Falcon.  But he is not quite ready to look presidential, and too marked as a traitor of chavismo for them to vote for him in a general election in 2012.  Paradoxically in my opinion a more right of center challenge can pull away a few votes from chavismo who will not see any point in voting for the chavismo light offered by Falcon, preferring a real change.  I am convinced that at least some within that left group are banking for the post Chavez era, when a PSUV made orphan by the defeat of Chavez might seek new spaces and then the alliance of PPT et al. could become that new home, in 2018.  Falcon will then be still young enough to run and finally get elected president, returning the left to office.

The COPEI option, a center right that never happens

The COPEI effort seems to me more doomed.  The problem here is that COPEI has not survived as well as AD and that its progeny is weak.  The only one that prospered and stands well above the lot is PJ but this one does not want anything to do with COPEI et al, (nor does PVzl wants to have anything to do with PJ for that matter).  There are also some atomized "right" groups that may go there but adding all of it up will not reach 20% in February 2012.  It is too bad for them because if that group united behind PJ they would have it all set for 2012, forcing the social democratic group and the democratic left to unite if they want to have a chance at winning the primary.

The problem of that group is also that they have no clear candidate.  Alvarez Paz could be a good one but today he is considered fringe, too much on the right.  Salas Feo, Carabobo's governor, has a certain sympathy but he is too lightweight to run outside of his base.  Besides, he did not do very well electorally at the last legislative election, beating chavismo but not as much as he should have done.  Thus this group is going to have to get its man probably from the National Assembly.  Some certainly have ambitions there, like Mendoza or Gomez Sigala, but I see no one strong for a national challenge.  And forget Tachira governor,, absolutely unelectable outside of the Andes (and even there...).  If I were to advise them I would suggest them to go for broke, become the liberal right of Venezuela and run in 2012 to build a real challenge in 2018.  But this time around you are out.

The only really new option

PJ's role I have hinted a lot above.  It is truly the only party today that can run alone for the primaries with a good shot at winning.  This is merely due to the projection of reasonable efficiency they have in the districts they rule over, with the top price of Miranda state, second only to Zulia, and which irradiates deeply in chavista misruled Caracas, making Caraqueños look with envy at the Caracas side inside Miranda state.  Further more, if Capriles Radonski, Miranda governor, is leading the polls today, he is not the lone electable PJ.  In a pinch either its secretary Borges or Petare mayor Ocariz could make a run at it if Capriles own run were to fizzle through a too long primary campaign.  I personally do not like Capriles too much but I have to admit that he has thrived under adversity in Miranda where chavismo has tried all against him short of poisoning his drinking water.  As such, in a post 2012 with chavismo sabotaging the new presidency since day 1, Capriles has demonstrated that he can deal with chavistas.

The problem with PJ is that I do not see them getting that 50% in February 2012.  They will do well, probably win, but they will have a hard time at reaching that 50% which is more indispensable for them as within the opposition only AD is more disliked than PJ...  It is not enough to carry Miranda and Caracas to win nationally and right now PJ is still very weak elsewhere except Aragua, Nueva Esparta ad a couple of other states.  On the other hand their candidate problem is solved and this one can focus on making inroads outside of Caracas while the other groups still need at least a quarter to sort out their candidate.

Long shots, but not to be discarded just yet

To end this let's look at possible outsiders taking the February prize.  If the primaries had been this year it would not be worth our time considering them, but with such a long political season many things may happen that suddenly one of these outsiders could become the chosen one.

There are several, the two main ones today being Maria Corina Machado (MCM) and Leopoldo Lopez (VP).  MCM is just positioning herself and has the celebrity status, and that she is really the only woman in the arena with a chance (the other one is the UCV president but I do not think she wants to run, or has not shown much interest so far).  MCM has no electoral machine, and even less outside of Caracas.  However her real shot is at becoming the compromise candidate of the COPEI group of parties, heck, even the compromise candidate of the social democrats as UNT could run her if Rosales remains barred from coming back to Venezuela and Perez decides that he needs to remain in Zulia to ensure that state against Chavez.  She is politically detached enough that she could fit anywhere, which might also be a minus as pragmatism is not very fashionable these days.

Leopoldo Lopez is steadily rising in polls and is hard at work building a real electoral machine. Unfortunately for him he is barred from running in 2012, unless his case wins a court ruling at the IAHRC and Venezuela is forced to accept it.  Very iffy right now.  However, even if in the end he cannot run he will have enough backing that his last minute support could decide the winner of 2012 primary.  King maker is not bad, if you ask me.

Besides the UCV president already mentioned there is only another outsider who does not show up much in polls yet but who has a wealth of electoral experience and in 10 months could do some damage.  Diego Arria is the lone politician from pre Chavez that has at least at chance at figuring.  This is because he has been such a steadfast anti Chavez voice that inside the opposition he has been able to attract notice since a lot of other candidates, like VP, pretend that Chavez is just some guy there looking for votes too, as if all were normal politics.  Unfortunately for Arria I do not see him as able to pry votes away from chavismo, his run so far being too much on principles and not enough on arepa y mondongo.  And yet it might be a good long run strategy as others run too much away from principles which are essential to motivate fully an opposition electorate.

Conclusions

Right now, in spite of the very deliberately misleading title of this post, it would be foolish to predict a winner.  Even though we see trends we need to wait for at least late July until we can start visualizing the possible outcomes.   The only thing we can give so far is a preliminary picture which will influence the candidate nomination process of each group.

Capriles is ahead, and will remain so for as long as no other group comes up with its candidate.  But right now he would not get much more than 30%.

The only serious potential rival to Capriles will be the "social democrat".  If Perez gets the nod, he could even win as right now, just with Zulia, Perez would get a 20%.

In third but really with no chance, would be Falcon if the democratic left were to unite.  With Lara, Aragua and disgruntled chavistas he could well reach a 15% right now.

The rest right now have no chance.  The only two which I see becoming a remote possibility are:

1)Leopoldo Lopez if he can run since right now he would get a healthy 15%.

2)MCM if she were to become the COPEI/PVzl candidate, or Salas Feo if he straightens up in the months ahead.  But in my book MCM is a much better candidate for that group though she might not want to be associated with them, which would leave them choosing between Salas Feo or Gomez Sigala.

Again, the campaign is long and history books are littered with front runners that died politically before election day.  But that is not the point of this post: the idea was to let you know why by December 2011 there will be at most 5 candidates still running and why by February 12 2012 that number might have gone down to 2 or 3 at most.

This is the inner logic of the opposition, to finally decant into 2 or 3 major groups defined through some ideological make up rather than historical tradition.  Times have changed and the renewal for all those who have not done so is there.  Only PJ and VP escape that curse because, well, they have already done their aggiornamento and that is why they are significant at polls, and growing.  All the others are laggards that have neither renewed nor detached fully from Chavez idiocy.

18 comments:

  1. torres9:17 PM

    Daniel, I think this is my new favorite post of yours. Awesome.

    --

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent post Daniel.

    Just one question (history): why did you associate Uslar Pietri in 63 with COPEI? As far as I know he ran with his own political "machine", which would become a more "formal" party after 1963.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good post, Daniel. I think you covered all the bases here.

    Excellent!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is far more informative than anything one reads in the Venezuelan paper-based media. A fine post.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AB

    I cannot write all Venezuelan political history in a single post but I can try to give details as needed.

    You are right, Arturo Uslar Pietri had nothing to do with COPEI and I have a feeling he never liked them very much. What happened is that in 1963 he run on what was clearly right of AD and pretty much all ganged against him as anti "pueblo", unfairly.

    As an ex minister, as an intellectual authority, what happened to him is a little bit what happened to Vargas Llosa in Peru: it was all used against him and the populism rabble was placed as a virtue, as the only honorable political position.

    As such Uslar who was given a chance at the beginning slowly faded and did well only in Caracas. He swore never to go into politics after that.

    COPEI learned vicariously the lesson and became as populist as AD was.

    PS: and this is yet another example that Chavez really did not invent anything, that he is just more AD than AD...

    ReplyDelete
  6. This was one hell of a post.

    Well played, sir.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for confirming Daniel.

    Indeed, Uslar did good (in Caracas), an almost unknown quantity in the rest of the country. You have covered what I would call as "provincialism of the capital" syndrome, that affects/has affected everyone, aside from AD and COPEI.

    Uslar was, IMO, too much of a man, an intellectual, and a free thinker for Venezuela. Centuries will come to pass before someone like him has a real shot at gaining power in Venezuela, and that is the reason why the country will continue leading the league of backwater africanised nations.

    Sadder still, there's no one in the public sphere of the country today "que le llegue por los tobillos" a Uslar. The intellectuals of today are joke, pathetic attempts of "free thinking men" that have contributed nothing, nowhere.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Excellent post.I learned a lot about the history of the parties.

    Where ideas are restricted through popular pressure, there can be no debate.Where only the Left has THE voice there can be no democracy.
    Where people don't feel free to think ' outside the box', true intellectualism is scarce...

    and as long as people falsely continue to tie all morality to the Left for political gain, people will loathe to be on the Right.Most people want to be good and to look good in the eyes of others.

    End of game.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Excellent post and very informative, Daniel. However, although I bow to your superior knowledge, I am not so sure that the traditional party affiliations and ideology are so important in this primary election. Before explaining, I do offer a caveat that my experience is in Nueva Esparta, which is populated by a mixture of all the original parties and doesn't exhibit the regional polarization in which some parties hold sway over particular regions.

    In the discussions I have with people here, it about is not about ideology, so much as:

    First and foremost: Who can beat Chavez?

    And only secondly: Who can roll up their sleeves and make the country function again?

    I think that the best candidate, and the most likely winner will be the one that defines themselves best as the "Anti-Chavez". In a primary election, we will not see a lot of votes from the apathetic. Most votes will come from the strongly anti-Chavista side of the political spectrum. Thus, the successful candidate will be the one who brands him/herself as best and most viable Anti-Chavez. There is always time after the primary to move toward inclusiveness and offer an olive branch to the disaffected Chavistas.

    Based on that, the nomination is still Rodonsky's to lose. Arria is an outside possibility, but I haven't seen any indications, yet, of him throwing his hat in the ring. Leopoldo Lopez has lost a lot of ground, and I don't see him catching up. MCM is a dark horse. She would have to do something remarkable to convince people she can go the distance.

    So, from what I can see, the candidate that will win the primary is the one that best delivers the message: "I can and will beat Chavez."

    I hope that is not an overly simplistic view, but that is what I see from where I am.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Roy

    You raise points but they are not really the point here :)

    This post is about giving a general outline of the situation and how things should evolve if these opposition leaders had a tad of common sense to form sub alliances in order to win the primary. In other words this post is part theory and part reality (people can decide which % of which....)

    For example if you read the interview of Ramos Allup today in El Universal you can read that he is even considering conversations with COPEI !!!!

    The best candidate to beat Chavez will be the one that wins the primary but it cannot be decided before the primary. People are simply too impatient and having that person right now would not speed up the end of Chavez constitutional term.... that is why there is a primary campaign, so people can figure out who they think is best instead of basing their choices on an impression or a "but he said that yesterday!" Just like in the US :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. "I can beat Chavez" is necessary. So is: "No revenge, we will look forward."

    It is a characteristic of totalitarian parties and countries that "everyone" is compromised just a little bit at least. It becomes hard to break with one's past allegiances if there is fear that those allegiances will be publicized or prosecuted.

    The opposition needs LOTS of ex-Chavistas.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "how things should evolve if these opposition leaders had a tad of common sense..."

    Dare to dream, Daniel... LOL

    On another note, what indications have you seen to indicate Diego Arria is even considering entering the race? Of everyone mentioned, he is probably the best qualified for the job, but his electability is a BIG question mark.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Individualism IS the common good.

    ReplyDelete
  14. UCC

    unfortunately that idea worked at caveman time. but today if you want roads and be able to throw bombs over qaddafy you need to include some common good.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Daniel,

    Collectivism and individualism are not opposites, when they are understood.

    I understand what UCC is saying.Before a person can unite with others he first has to become an individual.When people unite without developing their individuality there is nothing or little to unite with.This is what usually happens in a primitive society:Unity without individual consciousness.In modern times we are going from tribal mentality to a more highly individual consciousness.

    One cannot speak of altruism without personal identity.

    However when an individual more developed , then he/she can choose to work for the common good while maintaining a high level of individualism.I see this in my own town where quite a few very developed moral people decide to give a lot of their time and money to others in a spirit that comes from their personal consciousness.Rich people donated the football stadium and sponsor foreign students plus many other generous endeavors.Many Middle class folks give part of their salaries to local charities every month or year instead of going on expensive vacations.The poor help the poor in times of need. etc. etc.

    Our town would not function as well as it does without the kindness of its individuals.

    If we try to become the collective from the viewpoint of poor individual consciousness(the tribal mentality) then there will be no true collective because the collective will not be made up of the many individuals it supposedly contains, but rather from a group of people whose identities are blurred with that of the group.Thus this tribal like group cannot represent the power or fullness of each individual.

    So on a more developed level, true individualism becomes true collectivism, therefore the thought: individualism IS collectivism.

    ReplyDelete
  16. After re-reading this thread, Daniel, it occurs to me, that you are assuming that each of the parties can actually deliver the votes of their "constituency". Again, with the caveat of this being my impressions from Nueva Esparta, I don't see that sort of party loyalty here. The people I talk to will vote for the candidate they think can win, regardless of the party. Is it really so different on the mainland?

    ReplyDelete
  17. roy

    i can assure you that san felipe and porlamar are more distant than the mere caribbean would suggest.....

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous7:04 PM

    Great post. First time I read your blog.

    ReplyDelete

Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the third day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the following rules. I will be ruthless in erasing any comment that do not follow these rules, as well as those who replied to that off rule comment.

3)COMMENT RULES:
Do not be repetitive.
Do not bring grudges and fights from other blogs here (this is the strictest rule).
This is an anti Chavez blog, with more than 95% anti Chavez readers that have made up their minds long ago. Thus trying to prove us wrong is considered a troll. Still, you are welcome as a chavista to post,> in particular if you want to explain us coherently as to why chavismo does this or that. We are still waiting for that to happen once.
Insults and put downs are frowned upon and I will be sole judge on whether to publish them.

Followers