Monday, December 09, 2013

The 2013 mayoral election results (2): a bad day for Primero Justicia and Capriles

To start looking into the different results and making interpretations it is important to keep in mind a few things. For example, there are no legal elections scheduled for a couple of years, the National Assembly being the next ones for December 2015. Certainly with a regime as it is we can always expect a referendum, a recall something, etc. But it is clear that even a constitutional assembly is a long reach for an opposition that cannot keep its voters motivated. It requires A LOT of motivation to go to a constitutional assembly and not only Capriles failed to make this election a referendum on Maduro, a lousy president if any, but he lost about 2 million voters that went to the mall, watched TV, etc. That chavismo has as many refusing to show up is no consolation.  Thus we are going to have to live with what we have now: 3 governors, not even a quarter of mayors, and no TV. It is going to be a long two years in which the regime will make sure that the opposition does not get the means to finance an election, any election, even one for condominium chair if possible. This way the dictatorship can pretend to pass as a democracy knowing that it cannot lose elections.

Another consideration is that 15 years of chavismo have not been in vain. I will show in future posts that the client system is so efficient that in some states the opposition has simply no electoral possibility for the time being, starting with my own state of Yaracuy.  Simply put, the opposition will have to rely on its relative success in major urban centers to remain alive and try to defend what it can defend.  For those in the provinces we might as well find ways to join the PSUV to make sure we do not starve.

Also, we should consider that Capriles failure is also to be found in Miranda where it is clear that the parallel government set by Jaua has had an effect and that Primero Justicia has made may errors due to its arrogance as a party. In short, we do not have a solid leadership to face these long 2 years crossing of the Sinai.  I do not wish as I write this to besmirch Capriles: he has campaigned hard and well, he has been admirable and deserves all of our thanks. But he is now a defeated leader and has thus to either leave the scene or reinvent himself real fast.  Not only this will affect PJ even though it is Borges machine and not Capriles, but PJ has now new dogs barking in the court yard that I doubt it will be able to control that easily to remain top dog.

Thus I think it is fair to dedicate the first entry on the 2013 results to PJ and Capriles.

Fortunately to make my life easy I do not need to peruse into results all around the country to see how PJ did here and there. Already its hopes in Aragua, to name one, has been dashed even though through treachery by banning Mardo. But Mardo was also a product and victim of the PJ arrogant ambition, sending him first for mayor, then for representative, then for governor, and then back to mayor. What they did was to burn the poor guy and now I wonder what is PJ going to do with Aragua.

No, it will suffice to look at Miranda state to measure the magnitude of PJ dashed hopes and a now endangered Capriles.

Let's start with the two Caracas fiascoes.  We begin with Baruta that I know well since I used to vote there and where I stay and work when in Caracas. PJ, since it was the district that made Capriles, decided that Baruta was its birth right. They insisted on a primary there even though the mayor, Blyde, had been a decent mayor.  That would have been OK if the PJ front man was not a flawed one. Uzcategui is a good guy and I am sure he would make an excellent mayor. But like it happened to Lopez, he felt into the legal traps of chavismo and was under constant risk of being barred from running. Say what you want about chavismo incompetence in running the country and the economy but they have a long term view on electoral maneuvers and can come up with treachery tools years before the victims even know what is going to hit them.  Sure enough, Uzcategui won the primary with less than 1% and when the regime felt it convenient they struck, in the hope of demobilizing the PJ electorate and help indirectly the election that they really cared for, Villegas for Caracas mayor at large.

Fortunately for us chavismo seems to think that opposition voters are as stupid  as chavista voters and are led by a leash as they lead their own voters. It is not so and a grateful populace reelected Blyde brilliantly with almost 80%, and with LESS abstention than the nation wide figure. In fact it is possible that the anger of the Baruteños was stoked and they turned out en masse to avenge the regime treachery. But it could have been a disaster.

PJ did the same thing with Chacao where Grateron also lost the primary but with a wider margin. Then again Blyde was more appreciated than Grateron. PJ did recover Chacao (1). But Sucre, the Eastern part of Caracas, and a popular one was not won as handsomely as one expected a month ago when polls were giving Ocariz running for reelection an 2 to 1 margin. He did not reach 53%, possibly suffering of the demagogic organized looting of previous weeks. At least he will get, apparently, a majority in the council which was held by chavismo before, finding ANY excuse to sabotage his administration.

Even though not quite relevant to this entry, Libertador was also a mistake of PJ who sponsored there Ismael Garcia who may be a repentant chavista but was still too associated with the bad memories of Chavez.  How much of this, and how much of the Daka effect is to be used to explain his defeat in Libertador (in addition of blatant cheating) we will never know without adequate exit polling. But the fact is that any influence PJ was hoping for in the greater Caracas has been voided. The more so when we look at the disaster at El Hatillo.

El Hatillo is a district that should have been planned as the jewel of Caracas: semi urban, semi country side, romantic cool weather, historical village, etc. But El Hatillo has systematically voted for the worst electoral options, all in cahoots with savage developments construction companies which have transformed El Hatillo in a nightmare of traffic and deficient services.  Simply put, too many people expecting services for a tax base that could not cover those.

In 2012 primaries it was expected that this cycle of weak and corrupt mayors would finally be ended when a dynamic PJ candidate won. But he died within days of its victory. Considering that the high court wanted to see who voted in primaries to expand the Tascon List (2) it was simply impractical to do a new one. Since chavismo gets there one of its lowest scores nation wide (it got 11.4% yesterday) the opposition went in dispersed order. In the last weeks of the campaign it became clear that the two viable options were the one of PJ and the one of Voluntad Popular.  Elias Sayegh may have many qualities but besides coming from a background close to these developers who wrecked El Hatillo, was simply too much of a well behaved kid, with a puppet feel if you wish. David Smolanski is now a veteran of the student protests of 2007 and a rising star inside VP where Lopez promotes him as much as possible, contrary to what happens inside of PJ where leadership is reserved to the few already in place. With a smashing 44% Smolanski has inflicted a painful defeat to PJ who only got 31%.  And I dare say that the future for El Hatillo may be brighter because, at least as far as I know, Smolanski is not bound to any interest group that I know of. We will see how well he resits them once sworn in.

The missteps of PJ in Caracas do nothing to help Capriles in Miranda.  To punish Capriles from winning the April vote and expose the regime electoral fraud, this one created a parallel administration in Miranda state, Corpomiranda, who was given with plenty of money to Jaua who lost against Capriles last December. Jaua of course has been working hard at proving that he is the one that rules over Miranda even if he lost the election. That he is also foreign minister is not a problem, Venezuela is a pariah country now so he has plenty of time on his hands.

Jaua has been helped by Capriles, now in hindsight, erroneous decision to become the campaign leader for this election. While Capriles was going around the country trying to turn the election into a plebiscite against Maduro chavismo was pointing out relentlessly that he was not in Miranda taking care of his job while Jaua distributed freebies. A price was paid.

Let's start with Los Teques, the state capital. Beyond the fact that there was a Daka effect and that Maduro went there to inaugurate a half-assed metro station, in April Capriles carried Los Teques with 52.3%. Yesterday a lousy chavista candidate got 52% even though he got 18,000 votes less than Maduro did in April. Let's go to Higuerote where Capriles got 41% but where yesterday the opposition candidate did not reach 35%.  Let push further and go to next door Buroz, of Tacarigua, this most chavista area where Maduro got 66% and where yesterday a divided chavismo won anyway and summed up 79% anyway (the PSUV candidate losing but that is a tiny consolation prize).  Could Capriles win Miranda today?  Can an opposition circumscribed to Caracas and greater Caracas (we failed in promising Guatire and Los Teques, losing as expected Guarenas) expect to resit the onslaught coming against Capriles?

Tough times ahead for PJ and Capriles.  It is clear that Primero Justicia and Capriles come weakened from this election. Both need to do some hard thinking. Capriles needs to reinvent himself and get ready for the leadership challenges that this time will come likely from Lopez whose Voluntad Popular made significant gains, one of them detailed above. Primero Justicia needs to think whether becoming the lone opposition party is what is best for them.  Maybe the root problem is that Capriles is more anti Chavez than Primero Justicia who may be happy with a couple of governors and maybe about 30 town halls. Whatever it is, aggiornamento has come for both.


1) I am happy that the woman that chavismo sent to Chacao, Olga "Titina" Azuaje, who had 4, FOUR consecutive gigantic billboards in the heart of Caracas lost with barely 14%. She was a fraud through and through, appearing slim and sexy and modern in her heavily photoshopped posters when in fact she is a coarse chavista hack, chubby and vulgar and, well, idiotic.  I am willing to guess that even the chavista nouveau riche that moved to Chacao's Country Club did not vote for her.....

2) the Tascon List, reminder, is the list of those who signed against Chavez and thus became pariah in Venezuela, submitted to all sorts of vexations. In the 2012 primaries the participants were guaranteed privacy in their participation. But the regime through a sudden court ruling tried to get its hands on the voting participants. The opposition had to destroy in haste these records and be fined by the court for refusing to obey. But it was that or expanding the Tascon list!  The opposition leadership acted accordingly but for all practical purposes it is now almost impossible to conceive future primaries in what is now a dictatorial regime.


  1. Stefan11:48 PM

    1. The question of whether Capriles is the right leader depends on what Venezuela´s democrats think about him: Do they still trust him or not? Do they think that he ´s on the right path or not? Plus, does HE still want this job and has faith in his mission?
    2. Having lost some elections does not have to be a stigma or handicap, it depends on the circumstances. Let´s keep in mind that Lula da Silva needed 13 years and several elections until he was elected President of Brazil.
    3. The problem with changing the leadership now is that it would send the message that MUD has been unsuccessful hitherto because it has had the wrong candidate - and not because of unfair conditions and cheating. It would be tantamount to acknowledging that the elections were free and fair.
    4. If and when Maduro loses the next elections, it will not be due to the virtues of the opposition leader, but because the Venezoelan people decide that they are fed up with 21st century socialism. Therefore, it doesn´t matter much who´s leading the opposition, as long as he proposes a credible alternative.

    1. This is 2 in a series. More is yet to come, including my recommendations.

      I am not advocating a change in leadership. I am just pointing out that if Capriles wants to remain the leader he needs to reinvent himself fast. Just like Lula did.

    2. Stefan11:38 PM

      Yes, that´s true. It was this Lula who won the elections:
      Not this one:

  2. The good thing is that now we have 18 months without elections every office holder can be dedicated to their job.
    And those that lost today can keep making inroads in their respective municipalities.

  3. Daniel i said it in one of your previous post and i repeat it again i don´t consider Romulo Herrera the best candidate for Guaicaipuro. He might had been choosen in a primary but the guy for me was the local equivalent of a Jose Vicente Rangel or Teodoro Petkoff . A repeating looser in every election.
    More so in a district that having incompetent mayors still voted red to reelect the guy or to elect the next PSUV one in the list

    1. Yes, I know. And he barely made it in the primary but he made it. Still, Garces was no prize either so, all things being equal, Capriles was not enough of a factor to overcome the Romulo handicap....

      Note: the three districts I mention to show how percent wise Capriles went down I did it at sort of random. The three were clear, so my point as Capriles being unfairly judged by people is still valid. He cannot have his cake and eat it. Now he needs to go back and work hard because in a year form now he could face a recall election. he would win it, I am sure but what a waste of time.

    2. The victory claimed by both sides is a pyrrhic one at best. The fact that we expected (and deserved) more should not diminish the fact that there is an unwaivering, uncorruptable opposition base that has bravely held its ground despite years of abuse, expropriations, insults and diminished civil liberties. I don’t question your analysis of Caracas politics. However, my family and I were deeply disappointed that Julio Montoya did not win in San Francisco, Edo Zulia. How is it possible that such a deserving and prepared candidate should lose by such a wide margin to a Mafioso? How is it possible that our “diputado” lost when, less than a year ago, Capriles won in our municipality? I, for one, am weary of looking for the usual culprits. Furthermore, I refuse to blame Capriles or hold him responsible for not sufficiently motivating those who did not vote. Every single day we must deal with corruption, inflation, food shortages, crime, power outages, abuse of power, censorship. If that is not sufficient motivation, then what is? I don’t need Capriles to remind me. Rather, I am grateful that he is willing to represent us and speak for us here and abroad. Perhaps, our opposition leaders should begin to focus less on how to beat the cheaters and more on how to educate the chavistas and absentee opposition that we deserve better. In the meantime, my family and I will hunker down in survival mode and try to keep our values, family and future intact while we wait for our next opportunity for change.

      I enjoy your blog and am grateful for the window that you prop open to allow some fresh air and light ventilate our murky Venezuela.


Comments policy:

1) Comments are moderated after the sixth day of publication. It may take up to a day or two for your note to appear then.

2) Your post will appear if you follow the basic polite rules of discourse. I will be ruthless in erasing, as well as those who replied to any off rule comment.