I have used that French expression already twice for titles of this blog and I hope that the third time is a charm. If anything the French are right, "
fin de règne" are long, protracted affairs because the ones leaving do not know how to leave and the ones supposed to come have no idea how to do the deed, assuming they exist. Thus not only it turns out I am allowed to borrow
my own past title but I can also borrow a picture from that post which was more premonitory than what anyone would have expected then.
One way to simplify what I already described two years ago is that "fin de regne" are about the degradation of power without any clear option coming. That is why 1776 and 1789 would not qualify but the earlies 1710'ies in France of even 1846-1848 in Europe qualify. They all sensed that power was waning but nobody was quite sure what to do about it.
Fin de regne are not necessarily followed by revolutions or civil war but quite often one of both do happen then. Even Myanmar today does not qualify as
fin de regne as Aung San Su Kyi is willing to take power and the generals are trying to find a scheme to preserve in their hands the real power. A
fin de regne in the XX century as democracy is knocking at the door is a rather rare occurrence, happening in some African countries (Houphouët Boigny in Ivory Coast or even Mubarak in Egypt until the Tunisia uprising brought a sudden change, still ongoing as no one really was ready to pick up the pieces).